Course record CHEN

CHEN 3210

Chemical Engineering Heat and Mass Transfer

University of Colorado Boulder

378 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score22/100
Below average

Professors 9 of 9

Kayla Sprenger 378 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
23.8% A
45.5% B
24.1% C
4.5% D
2.1% F

378 letter grades

1.3% withdrew · 5 of 383 enrolled.

Robert H Davis 348 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

348 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.73
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.68
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.67
Questions4.60
Justin Tran 63 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

63 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Wendy Mores Young 1 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading2.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Hailey Caroline Loehde-Woolard 59 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

59 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.30
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Daisy Isabelle Fuchs 56 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.60
Reflection4.30
Respect3.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.00
Questions4.10
Rajarshi Chattopadhyay 59 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

59 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Madelyn Bennett 55 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Ritu Raj 55 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.