Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Dr. Wendy Young
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record CHEN
CHEN 3010
Applied Data Analysis
University of Colorado Boulder
412 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score30/100
Below average
Charles Raymond Nuttelman 207 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
207 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nuttelman vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
−8.9
C
−4.9
D
−1.0
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 5 of 212 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
160 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.74
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.15
Questions4.55
Carolyn Schoenbaum Kohlmeier 108 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
108 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kohlmeier vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+4.8
C
+3.9
D
+1.3
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 108 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
148 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.38
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.23
Reflection4.30
Respect4.68
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.48
Questions4.60
Joel L. Kaar 97 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kaar vs. the course average
A
−21.2
B
+13.6
C
+6.1
D
+0.6
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 98 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Brian Petersen 38 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Zach Meduna 63 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Kathryn O'Harra 75 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.73
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.71
Reflection4.40
Respect4.95
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Wendy Mores Young 86 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.38
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.51
Reflection4.48
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.61
Questions4.75
Course documents
Syllabi 1
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.