Course record CHEN
CHEN 2810
Biology for Engineers
University of Colorado Boulder
429 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2024
Flunk Score16/100
Needs work
Anushree Chatterjee 56 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chatterjee vs. the course average
A
+19.9
B
−5.1
C
−11.6
D
−1.9
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 1 of 57 enrolled.
Overall4.08 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Melissa J Mahoney 66 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
66 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mahoney vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
+12.9
C
−7.6
D
−1.9
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 2 of 68 enrolled.
Charles Raymond Nuttelman 182 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
182 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nuttelman vs. the course average
A
+3.0
B
−3.3
C
−1.4
D
+0.9
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 2 of 184 enrolled.
Overall3.89 / 5
144 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.59
Collaboration2.73
Connection4.30
Contribution3.38
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.38
Grading4.35
Reflection4.19
Respect4.63
Creativity3.45
Feedback3.21
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.18
Questions4.56
Theodore W Randolph 66 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
66 letter grades
Compare with the course
Randolph vs. the course average
A
−14.2
B
+6.9
C
+10.6
D
−1.9
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 66 enrolled.
Overall3.05 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.90
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.40
Grading2.90
Reflection3.30
Respect3.90
Creativity2.60
Feedback2.20
Interaction3.40
Challenge3.20
Questions3.20
Isaac Michael Richardson 59 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Richardson vs. the course average
A
−10.0
B
−7.2
C
+12.0
D
+3.2
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 2 of 61 enrolled.
Overall3.34 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.20
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.00
Reflection3.80
Respect3.70
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.20
Questions4.10
Holly Coleman 18 reported responses 3.31Eval / 5
Overall3.31 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.90
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.20
Reflection3.30
Respect4.20
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.40
Challenge3.80
Questions3.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.