Course record CHEN
CHEN 1203
General Chemistry for Engineers 2
University of Colorado Boulder
557 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Fernando L. Rosario-Ortiz 351 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
351 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rosario-Ortiz vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−2.5
C
−4.5
D
−0.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 8 of 359 enrolled.
Overall4.14 / 5
98 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.17
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.88
Grading3.94
Reflection4.30
Respect4.53
Creativity3.79
Feedback3.54
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.36
Questions4.26
Monica Ohnsorg 126 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
126 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ohnsorg vs. the course average
A
−14.2
B
+9.2
C
+4.9
D
+1.0
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 127 enrolled.
Overall3.59 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.30
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.40
Reflection3.60
Respect4.20
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions3.90
Jennifer N Cha 80 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
80 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cha vs. the course average
A
−8.1
B
−3.4
C
+12.1
D
−0.9
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 3 of 83 enrolled.
Overall3.29 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.38
Technology3.12
Synthesis3.27
Collaboration2.77
Connection3.28
Contribution2.92
Discussion3.56
Inclusivity2.84
Grading3.25
Reflection3.48
Respect4.20
Creativity3.52
Feedback2.84
Interaction3.92
Challenge3.65
Questions3.76
Irene Maria Francino Urdaniz 14 reported responses 3.26Eval / 5
Overall3.26 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.40
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration1.90
Connection2.80
Contribution2.70
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.40
Reflection3.50
Respect3.80
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.60
Interaction2.60
Challenge3.40
Questions3.90
Kathryn O'Harra 115 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
115 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.53
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.48
Reflection4.33
Respect4.68
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.51
Questions4.60
Michael R Shirts 18 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Andrew Pratt Goodwin 74 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.70
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.20
Reflection3.70
Respect4.40
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.