Course record CHEN

CHEN 1201

General Chemistry for Engineers 1

University of Colorado Boulder

1,565 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score13/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 13

Ehsan Keyvani Someh 257 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
37.4% A
37.0% B
15.6% C
5.4% D
4.7% F

257 letter grades

Compare with the course
Someh vs. the course average
A +2.8
B same
C −3.7
D +0.2
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 10 of 267 enrolled.

Carolyn Schoenbaum Kohlmeier 855 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
36.0% A
36.7% B
17.0% C
5.5% D
4.8% F

855 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kohlmeier vs. the course average
A +1.5
B −0.2
C −2.3
D +0.3
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 18 of 873 enrolled.

Jerome Michael Fox 453 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
30.2% A
37.3% B
25.6% C
4.6% D
2.2% F

453 letter grades

Compare with the course
Fox vs. the course average
A −4.3
B +0.4
C +6.4
D −0.6
F −1.8

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 10 of 463 enrolled.

Sam Swift 1 reported responses 2.43Eval / 5
Overall2.43 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection4.00
Contribution2.00
Inclusivity1.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction2.00
Mohammed Alkhater 117 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

117 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.40
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Brian Peter Radka 81 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Megan English 66 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

66 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Benjamin James Carberry 15 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.90
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Nicole Bea Day 15 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.90
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Olivia Irvin 272 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

272 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Show all 13 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.