Course record CHEM

CHEM 4531

Physical Chemistry 2

University of Colorado Boulder

189 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Tanja Cuk 46 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
47.8% A
41.3% B
8.7% C
2.2% D
0.0% F

46 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cuk vs. the course average
A +17.1
B −3.1
C −11.4
D −1.0
F −1.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 1 of 47 enrolled.

Jordy Bouwman 81 grades · 1 term 2.73GPA
22.2% A
43.2% B
25.9% C
4.9% D
3.7% F

81 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bouwman vs. the course average
A −8.5
B −1.2
C +5.8
D +1.8
F +2.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.4% withdrew · 2 of 83 enrolled.

Joel David Eaves 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.20GPA
41.2% A
41.2% B
17.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.

Sandeep Sharma 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.92GPA
22.7% A
59.1% B
13.6% C
4.5% D
0.0% F

22 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.

Niels Harley Damrauer 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
26.1% A
43.5% B
30.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.

Anthony J Dominic Iii 20 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Maddie Klumb 4 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Jessie Porterfield 3 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Andres Montoya Castillo 19 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.10
David Jonas 11 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.