Course record CHEM
CHEM 4511
Physical Chemistry 1
University of Colorado Boulder
192 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Andres Montoya Castillo 38 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Castillo vs. the course average
A
+11.9
B
+2.6
C
−14.6
D
−3.6
F
+3.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.51
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.53
Reflection4.86
Respect4.88
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.94
Questions4.82
Sandeep Sharma 55 grades · 1 term 2.88GPA
55 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sharma vs. the course average
A
−2.9
B
−1.9
C
+7.2
D
−1.8
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 5 of 60 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.63
Connection3.92
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.50
Reflection4.32
Respect4.98
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.65
Questions4.49
Veronica Vaida 59 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vaida vs. the course average
A
+2.0
B
−6.7
C
+4.1
D
−0.3
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 2 of 61 enrolled.
Overall4.16 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology3.78
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration2.65
Connection4.42
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.28
Reflection3.87
Respect4.59
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.92
Challenge3.94
Questions4.57
David Jonas 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.95GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
14.8% withdrew · 4 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.68
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.48
Reflection4.79
Respect4.98
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.88
Questions4.99
Jorg Mathias Weber 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.95GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Alina Margarita Mateo 8 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Steven S Brown 14 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.90
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Keaten John Kappes 14 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.90
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Matthew Laskowski 27 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Aman Kumar Agrawal 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.