Course record CHEM
CHEM 4021
Inorganic Laboratory
University of Colorado Boulder
81 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Michael Pesek Marshak 81 grades · 1 term 3.62GPA
81 letter grades
2.4% withdrew · 2 of 83 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology2.87
Synthesis3.52
Collaboration3.54
Connection2.88
Contribution3.56
Discussion3.57
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.53
Reflection2.75
Respect2.88
Creativity3.58
Feedback2.83
Interaction2.86
Challenge3.56
Questions2.16
Laura Anne Maurer 10 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.93
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.87
Respect5.00
Creativity4.87
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.80
Questions4.93
Jonathan Russel Thurston 20 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.93
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.94
Reflection4.66
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Claire E Boronski 3 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Casey Davis 7 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Benjamin Clayville 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.77
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.34
Reflection4.95
Respect4.84
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.43
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Mike Stodolka 4 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Jessie Porterfield 8 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.45
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.88
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Quinn Brink 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.