Course record CHEM

CHEM 3471

Organic Chemistry 2 for Chemistry Majors

University of Colorado Boulder

156 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 10

Xiang Wang 58 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
41.4% A
34.5% B
15.5% C
5.2% D
3.4% F

58 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A +10.6
B −0.8
C −8.8
D −1.2
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 2 of 60 enrolled.

Wei Zhang 51 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
25.5% A
37.3% B
25.5% C
7.8% D
3.9% F

51 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A −5.3
B +2.0
C +1.1
D +1.4
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 3 of 54 enrolled.

Maciej Andrzej Walczak 34 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
23.5% A
26.5% B
41.2% C
8.8% D
0.0% F

34 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walczak vs. the course average
A −7.2
B −8.8
C +16.8
D +2.4
F −3.2

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 2 of 36 enrolled.

David M Walba 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.75GPA
23.1% A
53.8% B
15.4% C
0.0% D
7.7% F

13 letter grades · Limited sample

7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.

Eric Miller 3 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Lacey Jane Wayment 6 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.80
Connection2.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Duk Kyu Yi 8 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Ethan Grant Miller 1 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Technology1.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alex Laveck 3 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
James D Greenwood 2 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection2.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion5.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.