Course record CHEM
CHEM 3331
Organic Chemistry 2
University of Colorado Boulder
1,602 grades59 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Jihye Park 449 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
449 letter grades
Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A
+7.7
B
+2.6
C
−6.0
D
−2.0
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 13 of 462 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
188 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.24
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.50
Reflection4.58
Respect4.80
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.74
Questions4.61
Maciej Andrzej Walczak 438 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
438 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walczak vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
+4.8
C
−2.2
D
−0.3
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 16 of 454 enrolled.
Overall3.70 / 5
129 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.33
Connection3.48
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.26
Grading3.43
Reflection3.91
Respect4.37
Creativity3.89
Feedback3.01
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.08
Questions4.01
David M Walba 162 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
162 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walba vs. the course average
A
−5.3
B
−4.2
C
+16.2
D
−3.3
F
−3.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 7 of 169 enrolled.
Overall2.79 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.56
Technology2.34
Synthesis2.75
Collaboration1.55
Connection2.93
Contribution1.84
Discussion2.28
Inclusivity1.89
Grading2.28
Reflection2.51
Respect3.82
Creativity2.85
Feedback1.73
Interaction3.22
Challenge2.91
Questions2.88
Wei Zhang 260 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
260 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A
−13.0
B
+7.1
C
+5.5
D
+2.5
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
8.1% withdrew · 23 of 283 enrolled.
Overall3.96 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.72
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.27
Connection4.13
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.37
Reflection4.34
Respect4.69
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.58
Questions4.28
Jacqueline Mae Richardson 293 grades · 1 term 2.69GPA
293 letter grades
Compare with the course
Richardson vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
−15.2
C
−1.5
D
+3.2
F
+9.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 18 of 311 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
161 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.02
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.68
Reflection4.60
Respect4.82
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.74
Questions4.79
Yiming Hu 7 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.35
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Lacey Jane Wayment 3 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration2.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.75
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Shaofeng Huang 15 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology3.04
Synthesis3.68
Collaboration2.62
Connection2.62
Contribution2.89
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.85
Reflection3.95
Respect4.29
Creativity4.52
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.09
Questions3.92
Zepeng Lei 19 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.95
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.55
Reflection4.85
Respect4.81
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.19
Questions4.86
Micah Ohlhausen 1 reported responses 3.44Eval / 5
Overall3.44 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Reflection4.00
Feedback4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.