Course record CHEM

CHEM 3331

Organic Chemistry 2

University of Colorado Boulder

1,602 grades59 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average

Professors 59 of 59

Jihye Park 449 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
44.5% A
39.0% B
14.3% C
1.3% D
0.9% F

449 letter grades

Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A +7.7
B +2.6
C −6.0
D −2.0
F −2.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 13 of 462 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Maciej Andrzej Walczak 438 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
36.1% A
41.1% B
18.0% C
3.0% D
1.8% F

438 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walczak vs. the course average
A −0.8
B +4.8
C −2.2
D −0.3
F −1.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 16 of 454 enrolled.

Open full professor record
David M Walba 162 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
31.5% A
32.1% B
36.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

162 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walba vs. the course average
A −5.3
B −4.2
C +16.2
D −3.3
F −3.3

Difference in percentage points.

4.1% withdrew · 7 of 169 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Wei Zhang 260 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
23.8% A
43.5% B
25.8% C
5.8% D
1.2% F

260 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A −13.0
B +7.1
C +5.5
D +2.5
F −2.2

Difference in percentage points.

8.1% withdrew · 23 of 283 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jacqueline Mae Richardson 293 grades · 1 term 2.69GPA
40.6% A
21.2% B
18.8% C
6.5% D
13.0% F

293 letter grades

Compare with the course
Richardson vs. the course average
A +3.8
B −15.2
C −1.5
D +3.2
F +9.7

Difference in percentage points.

5.8% withdrew · 18 of 311 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Yiming Hu 7 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.35
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Lacey Jane Wayment 3 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration2.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.75
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Shaofeng Huang 15 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology3.04
Synthesis3.68
Collaboration2.62
Connection2.62
Contribution2.89
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.85
Reflection3.95
Respect4.29
Creativity4.52
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.09
Questions3.92
Open full professor record
Zepeng Lei 19 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.95
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.55
Reflection4.85
Respect4.81
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.19
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Micah Ohlhausen 1 reported responses 3.44Eval / 5
Overall3.44 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Technology4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Reflection4.00
Feedback4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Dania El-Batal 16 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology3.37
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration2.77
Connection3.20
Contribution3.47
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.37
Reflection4.30
Respect4.77
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.87
Interaction3.83
Challenge4.13
Questions3.83
Open full professor record
Hoai Tieu Bao Pham 5 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.00
Connection2.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.60
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Eric Miller 21 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration3.73
Connection3.37
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.50
Reflection4.27
Respect4.77
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.37
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Wyatt Powell 16 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.10
Connection2.87
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.17
Reflection4.30
Respect4.87
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.07
Challenge4.33
Questions4.47
Open full professor record
Garrett Evenson 20 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.09
Connection2.94
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.04
Reflection4.09
Respect4.72
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.18
Questions4.19
Open full professor record
Timothy L Minger 41 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.53
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.95
Reflection4.93
Respect4.95
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Matthew Scott Mccoy 3 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Maxwell Staab 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Ruiheng Jing 4 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.79
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.79
Reflection3.96
Respect4.88
Creativity3.42
Feedback3.42
Interaction3.04
Challenge3.58
Questions4.42
Open full professor record
Tessa Hamilton Trexler Myren 1 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Somnath Dutta 13 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.94
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.67
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.67
Questions4.27
Open full professor record
Brendan Alexander Langmack 14 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration2.50
Connection2.40
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.90
Reflection3.55
Respect4.35
Creativity3.25
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.65
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Michael Joseph Stodolka 21 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.73
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.57
Reflection4.70
Respect4.35
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.60
Questions4.28
Open full professor record
Qiucheng Xu 30 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.82
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity3.46
Grading4.49
Reflection4.93
Respect4.92
Creativity4.87
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.00
Questions4.06
Open full professor record
Brandon Aaron Bishop 3 reported responses 2.50Eval / 5
Overall2.50 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.25
Technology2.00
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration1.50
Connection3.50
Contribution2.50
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.50
Grading2.00
Reflection3.25
Respect2.75
Creativity2.00
Feedback2.25
Interaction3.50
Challenge2.25
Questions2.75
Open full professor record
Cassandra Marisa Sanchez 16 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.20
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity2.85
Grading4.25
Reflection4.85
Respect4.30
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Austin Dean Bargmann 5 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Brianna Irene Check 21 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.41
Connection3.98
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.62
Respect4.88
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.39
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Hongxuan Chen 5 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.10
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.75
Reflection3.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Alan Joseph Trudeau Munoz 3 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Duk Kyu Yi 26 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.78
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.82
Reflection4.92
Respect4.94
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.94
Questions4.98
Open full professor record
Ethan Grant Miller 10 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.77
Connection3.65
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.83
Respect4.73
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.43
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Mike Stodolka 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.93
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.23
Reflection4.37
Respect4.73
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.37
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Tim Davis 7 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology2.95
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.30
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.85
Reflection3.40
Respect3.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.60
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
James D Greenwood 49 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

49 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.82
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.05
Reflection4.35
Respect4.74
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.34
Questions4.39
Open full professor record
Charlie Lu 23 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.26
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.30
Reflection4.26
Respect4.55
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.37
Questions4.28
Open full professor record
Mia Muse 38 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.82
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.87
Reflection4.72
Respect4.96
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.81
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Kyle Fisch 15 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.21
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.74
Reflection4.89
Respect4.94
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.74
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.89
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Alec Kolodziejczyk 15 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.95
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.98
Reflection4.92
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Lukas Gardner 15 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.97
Respect4.73
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Timothy Maxwell Davis 8 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.50
Contribution4.35
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Alex Laveck 9 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.25
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.45
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Novella Keeling 26 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.62
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.44
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.81
Questions4.84
Open full professor record
Quinn Brink 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Technology5.00
Discussion5.00
Respect5.00
Interaction5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Hunter Koltunski 16 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.04
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.26
Reflection4.87
Respect4.96
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.87
Questions4.91
Open full professor record
Hoang Phuc Pham 59 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

59 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.25
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.72
Reflection4.83
Respect4.98
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.96
Open full professor record
Max Abreu 27 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.49
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.86
Reflection4.72
Respect4.92
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.78
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Zhehao Yuan 39 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.87
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.77
Reflection4.71
Respect4.92
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.72
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Tania Shahvali 36 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.74
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.66
Reflection4.86
Respect4.83
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.91
Questions4.84
Open full professor record
Shota Hasegawa 10 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology3.20
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.05
Reflection4.33
Respect4.68
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Jessie Porterfield 331 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

331 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.68
Connection3.78
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.47
Grading4.05
Reflection4.22
Respect4.53
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.27
Questions4.34
Open full professor record
Lily Goulding 14 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.55
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.95
Reflection4.65
Respect4.77
Creativity4.28
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Diego Arredondo 1 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Zachary Gekow 38 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.26
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.43
Reflection4.60
Respect4.84
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Grant Spencer 5 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Antawn Gonzalez 8 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.13
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.27
Reflection4.57
Respect5.00
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Abby Rawlings 5 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Kenneth Pauley 1 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Kylie Short 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.