Course record CHEM
CHEM 2100
Foundations of Chemistry 2
University of Colorado Boulder
57 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Eleanor Carol Browne 44 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Browne vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
−2.6
C
−4.9
D
+1.0
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 1 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.47
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.38
Reflection4.48
Respect4.58
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.59
Questions4.53
Niels Harley Damrauer 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.05GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
David Courter 4 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
John James Malecha 3 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect3.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Callum Ross Douglass 7 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joe Santarelli 6 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Paul Jeffrey Ziemann 4 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.77
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.93
Contribution3.07
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.84
Reflection3.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.93
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.84
Bri Dobson 3 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Tyler Grina 10 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.