Course record CHEM
CHEM 1400
Foundations of Chemistry
University of Colorado Boulder
505 grades33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Gordana Dukovic 42 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dukovic vs. the course average
A
+15.7
B
−5.9
C
−10.5
D
+5.8
F
−5.1
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 3 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.08
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.18
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.02
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.68
Natalie Ahn 144 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
144 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ahn vs. the course average
A
same
B
−0.4
C
+3.3
D
+0.1
F
−3.0
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 13 of 157 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.42
Connection3.75
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.92
Grading3.75
Reflection4.20
Respect4.52
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.39
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.38
Questions4.25
Akhileshwar Khanal 184 grades · 1 term 2.58GPA
184 letter grades
Compare with the course
Khanal vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
+2.5
C
−0.6
D
−1.8
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 10 of 194 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.06
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.30
Reflection4.67
Respect4.61
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.61
Questions4.49
Katherine Shulenberger 68 grades · 1 term 2.46GPA
68 letter grades
Compare with the course
Shulenberger vs. the course average
A
+0.8
B
−8.0
C
+2.6
D
−0.3
F
+4.8
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 4 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Robert Parson 67 grades · 1 term 2.32GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parson vs. the course average
A
−9.2
B
+5.8
C
−1.5
D
+1.3
F
+3.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 4 of 71 enrolled.
Overall3.52 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.20
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.50
Questions3.90
Rachel Lynn Vanosdol 13 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.10
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.35
Chelsea Marie Toner 8 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Callum Ross Douglass 11 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.05
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.00
Reflection4.55
Respect4.20
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Steven Joseph Scappaticci 8 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity1.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Haileigh Houser 5 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.35
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.