Course record CHEM
CHEM 1400
Foundations of Chemistry
University of Colorado Boulder
505 grades33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Gordana Dukovic 42 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dukovic vs. the course average
A
+15.7
B
−5.9
C
−10.5
D
+5.8
F
−5.1
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 3 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.08
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.18
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.02
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.68
Natalie Ahn 144 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
144 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ahn vs. the course average
A
same
B
−0.4
C
+3.3
D
+0.1
F
−3.0
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 13 of 157 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.42
Connection3.75
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.92
Grading3.75
Reflection4.20
Respect4.52
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.39
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.38
Questions4.25
Akhileshwar Khanal 184 grades · 1 term 2.58GPA
184 letter grades
Compare with the course
Khanal vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
+2.5
C
−0.6
D
−1.8
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 10 of 194 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.06
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.30
Reflection4.67
Respect4.61
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.61
Questions4.49
Katherine Shulenberger 68 grades · 1 term 2.46GPA
68 letter grades
Compare with the course
Shulenberger vs. the course average
A
+0.8
B
−8.0
C
+2.6
D
−0.3
F
+4.8
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 4 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Robert Parson 67 grades · 1 term 2.32GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parson vs. the course average
A
−9.2
B
+5.8
C
−1.5
D
+1.3
F
+3.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 4 of 71 enrolled.
Overall3.52 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.20
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.50
Questions3.90
Rachel Lynn Vanosdol 13 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.10
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.35
Chelsea Marie Toner 8 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Callum Ross Douglass 11 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.05
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.00
Reflection4.55
Respect4.20
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Steven Joseph Scappaticci 8 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity1.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Haileigh Houser 5 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.35
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sashi R Weerawarana 16 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.40
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.65
Grading4.45
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
John James Malecha 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.95
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.15
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.85
Alexa Rae Carollo 9 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.05
Respect4.55
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.45
Questions4.20
Maxwell Staab 11 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.35
Sarah Frankel 8 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Doug Pazitka-Dorado 11 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology2.95
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.30
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.70
Questions3.50
Yu Zhou 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.65
Reflection4.90
Respect4.55
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Andrew Chomas 11 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity1.75
Grading3.65
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.85
Roberto Cardenas 4 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Ethan Crann 9 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Bert Cham 8 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection2.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Michael Lord 11 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.25
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.40
Reflection4.45
Respect3.75
Creativity3.05
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.10
Questions4.35
Tyler Grina 9 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Denver Talley 13 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.35
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.95
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Laura Denton 18 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.22
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.44
Reflection4.66
Respect4.61
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.73
Questions4.83
Nesya Sloane 7 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection5.00
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Novella Keeling 80 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.65
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.35
Samantha Eyolfson 8 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Max Abreu 15 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.95
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Clare Hermanson 14 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.75
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Brian Nies 8 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.15
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.95
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.15
Barbara Morales 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.25
Grading4.30
Reflection4.55
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Joy Liu 6 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.