Course record CHEM
CHEM 1221
Engineering General Chemistry Lab
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable36 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Ashutosh Mishra 18 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.35
Connection4.00
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.55
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.35
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.30
Questions4.45
Nicolas A Padilla 9 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.25
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.15
Grading4.05
Reflection3.75
Respect4.15
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.65
Interaction3.55
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Maoj Awad 18 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.87
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.67
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Emmanuel Anuoluwa Bamidele 16 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.05
Questions4.30
Yu Gong 7 reported responses 2.27Eval / 5
Overall2.27 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology2.50
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration2.00
Connection2.70
Contribution1.60
Discussion2.60
Inclusivity1.80
Grading2.70
Reflection2.30
Respect2.40
Creativity1.80
Feedback2.10
Interaction1.80
Challenge2.30
Questions3.00
Jason Schoeller Grue Newald 7 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.90
Benjamin Thomas Hohman 10 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.00
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.05
Reflection3.75
Respect3.70
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.50
Questions3.80
Chen Li 4 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.50
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.25
Benjamin R Feingold 9 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.10
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity1.15
Grading3.75
Reflection3.25
Respect3.65
Creativity3.55
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.35
Questions4.10
Alexander Clayton Bradley 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.