Course record CHEM
CHEM 1221
Engineering General Chemistry Lab
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable36 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Ashutosh Mishra 18 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.35
Connection4.00
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.55
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.35
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.30
Questions4.45
Nicolas A Padilla 9 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.25
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.15
Grading4.05
Reflection3.75
Respect4.15
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.65
Interaction3.55
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Maoj Awad 18 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.87
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.67
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Emmanuel Anuoluwa Bamidele 16 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.05
Questions4.30
Yu Gong 7 reported responses 2.27Eval / 5
Overall2.27 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology2.50
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration2.00
Connection2.70
Contribution1.60
Discussion2.60
Inclusivity1.80
Grading2.70
Reflection2.30
Respect2.40
Creativity1.80
Feedback2.10
Interaction1.80
Challenge2.30
Questions3.00
Jason Schoeller Grue Newald 7 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.90
Benjamin Thomas Hohman 10 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.00
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.05
Reflection3.75
Respect3.70
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.50
Questions3.80
Chen Li 4 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.50
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.25
Benjamin R Feingold 9 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.10
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity1.15
Grading3.75
Reflection3.25
Respect3.65
Creativity3.55
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.35
Questions4.10
Alexander Clayton Bradley 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jo Sony Kurian 16 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration4.93
Connection3.83
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.11
Reflection4.50
Respect4.91
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.78
Questions4.74
Henry Cardwell 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.45
Reflection4.30
Respect4.45
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.30
Questions4.85
Ethan Crann 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Lacey Roberts 4 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions3.50
Sai Chandra Yelishala 4 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection2.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Aina Solsona Pujol 3 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Matthew Eric Wise 3 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Minyan Wang 20 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.16
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.32
Reflection4.48
Respect4.84
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.62
Questions4.76
Alyssa Libonati 3 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Arkodip Mandal 5 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Natalie Bess Lemessurier 5 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Madelyn Bennett 6 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.80
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Eva Peurrung 9 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.10
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity2.10
Grading3.60
Reflection3.40
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.50
Questions4.90
Cora Becker 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Adam Samuel 12 reported responses 3.22Eval / 5
Overall3.22 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.00
Contribution3.20
Discussion2.70
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.10
Reflection3.60
Respect3.20
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.20
Questions3.00
Kieran Mccarthy 11 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Andy Redder 6 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Jair Castillo Martinez 9 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Juan Hanel 10 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.75
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.05
Questions4.10
Cat Cox 10 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Maelia Dziedzic 7 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Joy Liu 6 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Gabrielle Ho 10 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.05
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Nicole Clark 24 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.37
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.03
Grading4.22
Reflection4.53
Respect4.90
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.47
Questions4.56
Zahra Linsky 10 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.27
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.17
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.07
Reflection3.67
Respect4.40
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.17
Questions4.17
Micah Robyn 22 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.53
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.37
Reflection4.63
Respect4.97
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.