Course record CHEM
CHEM 1134
Laboratory in General Chemistry 2
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable159 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Alec Kroll 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Jorg Mathias Weber 7 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Nicholas Pompetti 13 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration2.15
Connection3.20
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.80
Reflection3.60
Respect4.45
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.60
Questions3.85
Zachary Ross Schiffman 14 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.25
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.70
Questions4.45
Yu Gong 6 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration1.00
Connection4.30
Contribution2.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.30
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.80
Interaction2.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Jessica Kelly Egan 7 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.10
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Brian E Riggs 8 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Alexis Myers 17 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.60
Contribution3.05
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.85
Reflection3.70
Respect4.05
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.65
Questions4.20
Tri H Le 13 reported responses 2.99Eval / 5
Overall2.99 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology2.20
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration1.80
Connection2.35
Contribution2.90
Discussion2.20
Inclusivity2.25
Grading3.25
Reflection2.75
Respect4.40
Creativity2.70
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.15
Challenge3.05
Questions2.30
Meagan Nichole Arguien 9 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.