Course record CHEM
CHEM 1134
Laboratory in General Chemistry 2
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable159 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Alec Kroll 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Jorg Mathias Weber 7 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Nicholas Pompetti 13 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration2.15
Connection3.20
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.80
Reflection3.60
Respect4.45
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.60
Questions3.85
Zachary Ross Schiffman 14 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.25
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.70
Questions4.45
Yu Gong 6 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration1.00
Connection4.30
Contribution2.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.30
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.80
Interaction2.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Jessica Kelly Egan 7 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.10
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Brian E Riggs 8 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Alexis Myers 17 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.60
Contribution3.05
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.85
Reflection3.70
Respect4.05
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.65
Questions4.20
Tri H Le 13 reported responses 2.99Eval / 5
Overall2.99 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology2.20
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration1.80
Connection2.35
Contribution2.90
Discussion2.20
Inclusivity2.25
Grading3.25
Reflection2.75
Respect4.40
Creativity2.70
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.15
Challenge3.05
Questions2.30
Meagan Nichole Arguien 9 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
David Courter 7 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
James Spencer Stewart 5 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.50
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Kyle Anthony Mcmillan 17 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.85
Contribution3.45
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.35
Respect4.90
Creativity3.45
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.90
Questions4.35
Haley Ana Petersen 16 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.46
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration2.87
Connection3.96
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.32
Grading4.26
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.13
Questions4.57
Lauren Denise Bauerle 11 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.99
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.22
Grading5.00
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Maoj Awad 14 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration2.00
Connection3.35
Contribution3.25
Discussion2.80
Inclusivity4.05
Grading3.65
Reflection3.70
Respect4.60
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.55
Questions4.05
Austin Dean Bargmann 14 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.70
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Raythe Elliett Douglass Owens 46 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.10
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.79
Grading4.70
Reflection4.42
Respect4.76
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.66
Questions4.69
Seth William Mcpherson 14 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.55
Contribution3.45
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.20
Reflection3.70
Respect4.90
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.65
Joseph Patrick D'Alesio 14 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.55
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Micah Ohlhausen 22 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration2.23
Connection4.13
Contribution3.42
Discussion3.62
Inclusivity2.35
Grading4.15
Reflection3.93
Respect4.72
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.13
Questions3.78
Skylar Javin Sherman 7 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.05
Contribution3.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.75
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.35
Feedback5.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Casey Davis 12 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.75
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.45
Reflection4.05
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.45
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Aman Kumar Agrawal 14 reported responses 3.17Eval / 5
Overall3.17 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.45
Synthesis2.95
Collaboration1.95
Connection2.85
Contribution2.10
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.25
Reflection3.25
Respect4.40
Creativity3.05
Feedback3.30
Interaction2.65
Challenge3.15
Questions3.95
Justin Louis Ratkovec 14 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.98
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.98
Reflection4.98
Respect4.98
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Yuchun Cai 14 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.55
Contribution3.05
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.10
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.20
Questions4.65
Iliya Sabzevari 8 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.80
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Matthew Paul Mohacey 11 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.33
Connection3.43
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.23
Reflection4.20
Respect4.67
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Arindam Sau 12 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.35
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.25
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.45
Questions4.40
Heinrich Johannes Salzmann 12 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.45
Connection3.95
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.35
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.45
Questions4.65
Xubo Wang 7 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Yu Zhou 21 reported responses 3.33Eval / 5
Overall3.33 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.52
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.06
Collaboration3.14
Connection2.40
Contribution2.93
Discussion2.78
Inclusivity2.18
Grading2.62
Reflection3.40
Respect3.42
Creativity3.02
Feedback2.97
Interaction3.19
Challenge2.93
Questions2.98
Steven Joseph Scappaticci 8 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.75
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.30
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.45
Questions4.70
Jingyi Wu 4 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Srijan Bhattacharyya 14 reported responses 3.32Eval / 5
Overall3.32 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.27
Technology4.03
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration3.13
Connection3.00
Contribution2.50
Discussion3.57
Inclusivity2.77
Grading3.33
Reflection3.73
Respect3.53
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.77
Challenge2.93
Questions3.67
Robyn Sjovold 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions3.00
Joy Armendariz 59 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.82
Connection3.80
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity3.48
Grading4.67
Reflection4.44
Respect4.66
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.85
Questions4.84
Daniel Ocampo 26 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.49
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.76
Reflection4.94
Respect4.96
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.85
Questions4.77
Jennifer Lynn Sormberger 14 reported responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration1.75
Connection2.90
Contribution2.60
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.50
Grading2.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.35
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.35
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.55
Questions4.20
Hanalei Rose Chinitz Lewine 16 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.05
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Ashley Elizabeth Sullivan 16 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.45
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect4.95
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Barbara Morales 17 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.30
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.92
Reflection4.44
Respect4.97
Creativity4.92
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.81
Questions4.94
Paul Ryan Zayka 15 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.89
Connection3.74
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.24
Reflection4.32
Respect4.96
Creativity4.72
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.52
Questions4.76
Alexander Thomas Gilligan 5 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Brian Vincent Clark 13 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.35
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.85
Grading3.50
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.85
Questions4.15
Ryan Kenneth Messer 11 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.40
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.80
Reflection3.75
Respect3.40
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.05
Questions3.90
Cassius Clay Boyd 23 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.05
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.70
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Alan Joseph Trudeau Munoz 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.65
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.65
Samantha Michelle Rau 11 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.10
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Zachary Wiethorn 15 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.20
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Benjamin Rich 11 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Douglas J Pazitka-Dorado Jr 12 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.15
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.95
Reflection4.50
Respect4.35
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.00
Olivia Faye Bird 12 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.35
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Rida Noor 8 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.40
Contribution4.05
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.15
Grading3.65
Reflection3.75
Respect4.05
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.15
Questions3.55
Dakota Ross Hunt 31 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.75
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Angelina Lisa Leonardi 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.65
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Jared Peter Bozzone 8 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Luisa Macedo De Vasconcelos 7 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration4.55
Connection2.50
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.25
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.75
Questions3.65
Ben Rich 19 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.93
Connection3.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions3.93
Zach Wiethorn 16 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.43
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.36
Respect4.91
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.56
Questions4.79
Christopher Marelli 5 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.40
Callum Ross Douglass 3 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Alina Margarita Mateo 11 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.52
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.35
Reflection4.81
Respect4.78
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.52
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Casey Boyd 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Samson Adelani 14 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.85
Reflection3.90
Respect4.05
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.95
Questions3.80
Matthew Kwan 13 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.80
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Nicole Silver 6 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.25
Reflection4.25
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.25
Questions4.75
Maddie Klumb 13 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.55
Respect4.50
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Troy Colleran 6 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.75
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.25
Somnath Dutta 48 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.93
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.93
Reflection4.97
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.96
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.96
Patrick Holland 11 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Wyndom Sage Chace 9 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ally Stjean 11 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.05
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.85
Shea Doty 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.25
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Nianzi Liu 45 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.74
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.21
Reflection4.18
Respect4.31
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.34
Questions4.47
Brandon Aaron Bishop 25 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology3.44
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration4.07
Connection3.44
Contribution3.63
Discussion3.43
Inclusivity2.49
Grading3.42
Reflection3.86
Respect3.30
Creativity3.52
Feedback3.75
Interaction3.79
Challenge3.89
Questions4.03
Alyvia O'Brien 5 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Suming An 22 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.92
Connection3.39
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.66
Grading4.38
Reflection4.44
Respect4.88
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.67
Questions4.79
Henry Cardwell 19 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.36
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration4.48
Connection3.29
Contribution3.52
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.02
Reflection3.85
Respect4.42
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.19
Questions4.47
Minyan Wang 14 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.85
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.05
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Chuy Rivera 12 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.45
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Dang Nguyen 12 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.20
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.10
Benjamin Clayville 9 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.25
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Olusola Akinbami 11 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.65
Reflection4.20
Respect4.75
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.40
Questions3.45
Raina V Gough 4 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration5.00
Connection2.50
Contribution4.38
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection4.32
Interaction4.47
Miles San Soucie 13 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.25
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Samuel Coates 19 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect4.82
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.72
Questions5.00
Roberto Cardenas 21 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.52
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.09
Reflection4.63
Respect4.86
Creativity4.75
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.73
Questions4.45
Kyle Tyner 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.47
Reflection4.90
Respect4.77
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Doug Pazitka-Dorado 4 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.20
Rory Robert Mcclish 18 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Maddie Farber 36 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.06
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.48
Reflection4.73
Respect4.66
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.64
Questions4.87
Courtney Bailey 9 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.35
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Joe Santarelli 11 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Tony Hampton 6 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Drew Blauth 10 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection2.90
Contribution3.75
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.50
Grading2.80
Reflection4.00
Respect3.85
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.15
Questions3.75
Jim Hall 15 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.15
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.69
Reflection4.65
Respect4.91
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions4.70
Danya Al Nazal 3 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Bert Cham 12 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Jeff Price 9 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.95
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.40
Sarah Frankel 5 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Andre Schaum 23 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.10
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Ellie Lander 9 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.05
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.65
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Ethan Crann 5 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Brian Nies 13 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.30
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.35
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Denver Talley 47 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.43
Reflection4.88
Respect4.60
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.63
Questions4.89
Hamza Ansar 13 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.40
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.00
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Matthew Laskowski 20 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Zirui Wang 17 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.31
Synthesis3.64
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.65
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.84
Reflection3.10
Respect4.91
Creativity3.89
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.91
Challenge3.68
Questions4.50
Clara Lietzke 16 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.45
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Jonathan Lee 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Max Abreu 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.43
Reflection4.96
Respect5.00
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.71
Questions4.46
Andrew Chomas 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Loren Andrews 16 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.24
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.31
Grading4.32
Reflection4.49
Respect4.78
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.48
Questions4.64
Keller Elswick 9 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Charlie Smith 24 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.50
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.59
Reflection4.97
Respect4.86
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Vance Fowler 27 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.41
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.72
Reflection4.52
Respect4.89
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.72
Questions4.97
Natalie Couch 14 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.54
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity2.81
Grading4.35
Reflection4.73
Respect4.92
Creativity3.74
Feedback4.42
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.53
Questions4.92
Prokriti Saha 23 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.41
Collaboration4.52
Connection2.98
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity2.71
Grading4.42
Reflection4.13
Respect4.46
Creativity3.88
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.46
Questions4.45
Valentina Osorio 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.02
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity2.96
Grading4.83
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.75
Questions4.88
Matt Shulman 22 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.18
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.77
Reflection4.79
Respect4.83
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.67
Questions4.82
Dhiman Nandi 28 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.76
Synthesis3.54
Collaboration4.79
Connection3.69
Contribution3.98
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity3.31
Grading3.38
Reflection4.28
Respect3.98
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.09
Questions4.15
Lee Feinman 27 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.21
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.66
Reflection4.91
Respect4.90
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.94
Questions4.83
Jacob Simonpietri 32 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.09
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.79
Reflection4.36
Respect4.89
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.23
Questions4.60
Jack Widmer 9 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.95
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.05
Respect4.60
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Laura Denton 16 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.30
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Rashmi Pant 10 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.40
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.15
Reflection3.90
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.05
Questions4.50
Michael Lord 14 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.00
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.05
Reflection4.55
Respect4.00
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Clara Ursic 7 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Tyler Grina 32 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.42
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.44
Reflection4.60
Respect4.84
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.66
Questions4.68
Liam Warren 9 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.65
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Noah Lohar 15 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.95
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.95
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lily Harmon 2 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zihao Yue 5 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.15
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.45
Reflection4.32
Respect4.55
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.45
Questions4.55
Tyler Lakey 24 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.31
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.85
Reflection4.66
Respect4.81
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.92
Laura Breternitz 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.20
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Anjali Kalagiri 10 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.85
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.95
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.65
Questions4.35
Audrey Lyp 7 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.35
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.45
Reflection4.45
Respect4.10
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.10
Serim Park 7 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.65
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.85
Reflection3.85
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.40
Questions3.55
Ashutosh Mishra 9 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Lane Marie Terry 8 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.25
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.90
Questions4.55
Paige Difronzo 8 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.65
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Brandon Willey 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Aubrey Wolfe 14 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.55
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.40
Questions4.95
Vanessa Nguyen 10 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.40
Brenner Klein 7 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.75
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Clare Hermanson 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Blaine Cooper 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.95
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.00
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Novik Thomas 10 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Camille Conte 11 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.65
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Zhen Cai 5 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Qiucheng Xu 6 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.10
Reflection4.25
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.25
Eric Lian 10 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Sydney Edwards 8 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.95
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Jonquil Loeffelholz 8 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.25
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.35
Ethan Fink 5 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Ruhi Patel 6 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Micah Robyn 9 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Zahra Linsky 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.