Course record CHEM

CHEM 1133

General Chemistry 2

University of Colorado Boulder

4,980 grades182 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average

Professors 182 of 182

Raina V Gough 133 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
57.1% A
29.3% B
10.5% C
2.3% D
0.8% F

133 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gough vs. the course average
A +30.3
B −2.8
C −14.4
D −6.3
F −6.8

Difference in percentage points.

0.7% withdrew · 1 of 134 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Ellen Patricia Broering Mckeown 202 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
37.6% A
32.2% B
20.8% C
4.0% D
5.4% F

202 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mckeown vs. the course average
A +10.8
B same
C −4.1
D −4.6
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 9 of 211 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Nabilah A. Rontu Carlon 1,915 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
28.4% A
32.8% B
24.1% C
8.0% D
6.7% F

1,915 letter grades

Compare with the course
Carlon vs. the course average
A +1.5
B +0.7
C −0.8
D −0.5
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 77 of 1,992 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Christine Mina Kelly 275 grades · 1 term 2.55GPA
27.6% A
31.3% B
24.4% C
8.4% D
8.4% F

275 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kelly vs. the course average
A +0.8
B −0.9
C −0.5
D −0.2
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

4.5% withdrew · 13 of 288 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Susan Marie Hendrickson 1,465 grades · 1 term 2.51GPA
23.6% A
32.1% B
25.6% C
9.4% D
9.3% F

1,465 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hendrickson vs. the course average
A −3.2
B same
C +0.7
D +0.9
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

6.4% withdrew · 101 of 1,566 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Matthew Eric Wise 521 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
23.2% A
32.8% B
25.5% C
9.4% D
9.0% F

521 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wise vs. the course average
A −3.6
B +0.7
C +0.6
D +0.9
F +1.4

Difference in percentage points.

4.9% withdrew · 27 of 548 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Alexander Saltzman 92 grades · 1 term 2.44GPA
21.7% A
29.3% B
31.5% C
12.0% D
5.4% F

92 letter grades

Compare with the course
Saltzman vs. the course average
A −5.1
B −2.8
C +6.6
D +3.4
F −2.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 3 of 95 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jay Kroll 358 grades · 1 term 2.41GPA
19.3% A
30.4% B
31.8% C
10.9% D
7.5% F

358 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kroll vs. the course average
A −7.6
B −1.7
C +6.9
D +2.4
F same

Difference in percentage points.

5.3% withdrew · 20 of 378 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Rebecca Flitton Ciancanelli 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.28GPA
52.6% A
26.3% B
21.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Doug Pazitka-Dorado 4 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Tri H Le 15 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.35
Reflection3.70
Respect4.15
Creativity3.05
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.20
Questions3.75
Open full professor record
Meagan Nichole Arguien 11 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.65
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.05
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Maoj Awad 13 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.85
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Zachary Ross Schiffman 15 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Kyle Anthony Mcmillan 10 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.35
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
David Courter 5 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.20
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Brian E Riggs 15 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.30
Reflection4.05
Respect4.90
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Jessica Kelly Egan 15 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.65
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.05
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Haley Ana Petersen 18 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.73
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.46
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.48
Grading4.22
Reflection4.40
Respect4.79
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.66
Questions4.78
Open full professor record
Alexis Myers 11 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.55
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.05
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Nicholas Pompetti 16 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.65
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Lauren Denise Bauerle 178 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

178 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.87
Technology3.28
Synthesis2.64
Collaboration2.88
Connection2.82
Contribution2.68
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.34
Grading3.44
Reflection3.25
Respect3.77
Creativity2.73
Feedback2.26
Interaction3.68
Challenge3.11
Questions3.25
Open full professor record
Yu Gong 5 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.60
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Nabilah Arshad Rontu Carlon 475 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

475 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.89
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.56
Reflection4.56
Respect4.75
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.63
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Joseph Patrick D'Alesio 8 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.05
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity3.05
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Elizabeth M Dube 12 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Raythe Elliett Douglass Owens 56 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.08
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.52
Reflection4.75
Respect4.82
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Iliya Sabzevari 11 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Heinrich Johannes Salzmann 7 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.15
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Yu Zhou 19 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.19
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.91
Reflection4.89
Respect4.72
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.83
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Casey Davis 10 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.35
Reflection4.40
Respect4.45
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Aman Kumar Agrawal 12 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Justin Louis Ratkovec 11 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.98
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Arindam Sau 11 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.70
Reflection4.05
Respect4.15
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.75
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Skylar Javin Sherman 10 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.80
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Caroline Nondin 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Yuchun Cai 8 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.45
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Austin Dean Bargmann 13 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.45
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Matthew Paul Mohacey 14 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.47
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.07
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity2.83
Grading4.37
Reflection4.33
Respect4.83
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.33
Questions4.47
Open full professor record
Micah Ohlhausen 14 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.07
Grading3.75
Reflection4.53
Respect4.77
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.70
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Ellen Broering 323 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

323 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.53
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.80
Reflection4.75
Respect4.82
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Xubo Wang 4 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Seth William Mcpherson 12 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.85
Reflection4.10
Respect4.35
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Steven Joseph Scappaticci 11 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.55
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
John Davis Sterrett 6 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Katherine Demaree 4 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Srijan Bhattacharyya 12 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.83
Contribution4.23
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity2.70
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge2.83
Questions4.33
Open full professor record
Paul Ryan Zayka 10 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.11
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.89
Reflection4.86
Respect4.95
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.89
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Jingyi Wu 2 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Robyn Sjovold 2 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Jennifer Lynn Sormberger 13 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.45
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.40
Reflection4.15
Respect4.55
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Barbara Morales 9 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Joy Armendariz 24 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.20
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.74
Reflection4.58
Respect4.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.57
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Ashley Elizabeth Sullivan 17 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Brian Vincent Clark 7 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.60
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.15
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.35
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Alexander Thomas Gilligan 7 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.95
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Hanalei Rose Chinitz Lewine 6 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.00
Respect3.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.15
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Daniel Ocampo 17 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.43
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.59
Reflection4.36
Respect5.00
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions4.99
Open full professor record
Cassius Clay Boyd 10 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.65
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.10
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Olivia Faye Bird 15 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.55
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Angelina Lisa Leonardi 14 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.05
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.55
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Zachary Wiethorn 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.05
Grading5.00
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity3.65
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Ryan Kenneth Messer 10 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Rachel Weintraub 7 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology2.65
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.30
Contribution3.85
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.25
Reflection3.85
Respect4.35
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.75
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
Douglas J Pazitka-Dorado Jr 11 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.55
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Luisa Macedo De Vasconcelos 5 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.35
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.35
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Dakota Ross Hunt 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Alan Joseph Trudeau Munoz 8 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Rida Noor 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Jared Peter Bozzone 9 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.85
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Alec Kroll 167 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

167 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.51
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.16
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.32
Reflection4.39
Respect4.69
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.42
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Samantha Michelle Rau 12 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Benjamin Rich 19 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.60
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.55
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.05
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
Alex Saltzman 73 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

73 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.08
Connection3.75
Contribution3.78
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.03
Grading3.91
Reflection4.28
Respect4.01
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.24
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Callum Ross Douglass 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Ben Rich 19 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.53
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.90
Reflection4.63
Respect4.93
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.87
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Zach Wiethorn 19 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.89
Connection3.95
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.39
Reflection4.79
Respect4.97
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.67
Questions4.96
Open full professor record
Christopher Marelli 6 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Alina Margarita Mateo 14 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.39
Connection3.48
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.61
Grading3.67
Reflection4.35
Respect4.45
Creativity3.87
Feedback2.93
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.33
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Somnath Dutta 51 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.22
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.90
Connection2.38
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity3.25
Grading1.64
Reflection4.95
Respect3.32
Creativity4.83
Feedback1.59
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.91
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Maddie Klumb 10 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.25
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Patrick Holland 5 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.25
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.75
Reflection3.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.75
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Matthew Kwan 10 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.85
Respect4.75
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Casey Boyd 4 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Nicole Silver 19 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.80
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Samson Adelani 12 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.35
Contribution4.05
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.10
Reflection3.75
Respect4.15
Creativity3.45
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.75
Questions3.85
Open full professor record
Wyndom Sage Chace 12 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.25
Respect4.15
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.45
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Troy Colleran 9 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.85
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Miles San Soucie 13 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.20
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.85
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.15
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Kyle Tyner 14 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.80
Reflection4.95
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Suming An 20 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.32
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.90
Reflection4.92
Respect4.95
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.84
Questions4.99
Open full professor record
Brandon Aaron Bishop 17 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.68
Collaboration4.74
Connection3.53
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.26
Reflection4.27
Respect3.73
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.39
Questions4.13
Open full professor record
Roberto Cardenas 21 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.37
Connection3.95
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.75
Reflection4.46
Respect4.94
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.71
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Henry Cardwell 31 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.64
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.03
Reflection4.42
Respect4.47
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.41
Questions4.48
Open full professor record
Kayla Molison 10 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Nianzi Liu 46 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.72
Connection3.80
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.56
Reflection4.74
Respect4.69
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.67
Questions4.62
Open full professor record
Chuy Rivera 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Samuel Coates 17 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.77
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.10
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.97
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.93
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Dang Nguyen 8 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.25
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Minyan Wang 9 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.75
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Olusola Akinbami 13 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.10
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.75
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.70
Questions3.95
Open full professor record
Benjamin Clayville 15 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.15
Reflection4.90
Respect4.40
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Shea Doty 16 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.33
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.63
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Alyvia O'Brien 4 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Ally Stjean 17 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
James Spencer Stewart 3 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Diego Barragan Diaz 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Danya Al Nazal 3 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Drew Blauth 10 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.15
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.45
Reflection4.65
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Rory Robert Mcclish 17 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.15
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.35
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Joe Santarelli 12 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.95
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Tony Hampton 4 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.93
Contribution4.84
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Maddie Farber 35 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.59
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.46
Grading4.50
Reflection4.44
Respect4.66
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.52
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Jim Hall 19 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.77
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.84
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Courtney Bailey 6 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Denver Talley 42 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.02
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.88
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.84
Questions4.96
Open full professor record
Andre Schaum 14 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.25
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.25
Reflection4.25
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Jeff Price 12 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.75
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Zirui Wang 13 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.16
Technology4.44
Synthesis3.11
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.10
Contribution4.43
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.86
Reflection3.24
Respect4.89
Creativity3.11
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.37
Questions4.89
Open full professor record
Hamza Ansar 12 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.15
Reflection4.90
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Matthew Laskowski 15 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.55
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Bailey Knierim 5 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Brian Nies 17 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.90
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Bert Cham 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.25
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Clara Lietzke 27 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.10
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.65
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Ethan Crann 8 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Ellie Lander 13 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.65
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.15
Reflection4.55
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Sarah Frankel 13 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.31
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.60
Reflection4.91
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Kerri Sheehy 4 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jonathan Lee 3 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Laura Denton 18 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.78
Connection3.93
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.30
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.61
Questions4.91
Open full professor record
Max Abreu 21 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.05
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.38
Reflection4.63
Respect4.92
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.84
Questions4.88
Open full professor record
Andrew Chomas 1 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Dhiman Nandi 26 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology3.68
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.05
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.13
Reflection4.25
Respect4.46
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.76
Interaction4.68
Challenge3.83
Questions4.14
Open full professor record
Prokriti Saha 30 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology3.71
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.54
Connection3.87
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.06
Reflection4.48
Respect4.30
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.45
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Valentina Osorio 18 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.02
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.44
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.69
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Loren Andrews 6 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Lee Feinman 30 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.37
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.58
Reflection4.72
Respect4.94
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.92
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Matt Shulman 18 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.84
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.85
Reflection4.87
Respect4.71
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.87
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Vance Fowler 25 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.88
Connection3.53
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.51
Reflection4.76
Respect4.56
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.54
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Charlie Smith 25 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.67
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.74
Reflection4.82
Respect4.82
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.82
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Keller Elswick 13 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.99
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.91
Connection3.71
Contribution4.48
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.73
Grading4.38
Reflection4.86
Respect5.00
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.79
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Natalie Couch 16 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.73
Connection2.75
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.88
Reflection4.56
Respect4.71
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.42
Questions4.48
Open full professor record
Jacob Simonpietri 24 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.03
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.67
Reflection4.48
Respect4.52
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.52
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Clara Ursic 5 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Michael Anthony Swanson 63 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

63 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.15
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.04
Grading4.65
Reflection4.61
Respect4.76
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.19
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Tyler Grina 27 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.44
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.76
Reflection4.68
Respect4.88
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.82
Questions4.84
Open full professor record
Liam Warren 5 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.85
Connection2.90
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.75
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Michael Lord 7 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.05
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.05
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Noah Lohar 16 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.45
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Rashmi Pant 4 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.25
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.75
Respect3.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Jack Widmer 7 reported responses 3.11Eval / 5
Overall3.11 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology2.70
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration3.10
Connection2.80
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.20
Reflection3.30
Respect3.80
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.20
Interaction2.90
Challenge3.70
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Evy Bernardette Mcumber 13 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.36
Connection4.07
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.38
Reflection4.39
Respect4.93
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.16
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Zihao Yue 4 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.23
Reflection4.77
Respect4.46
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.23
Questions4.23
Open full professor record
Abhigyan Deoli 3 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Laura Breternitz 6 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.85
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.65
Reflection4.30
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions3.85
Open full professor record
Tyler Lakey 18 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.58
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.85
Reflection4.71
Respect4.50
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.67
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Paige Difronzo 7 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Audrey Lyp 3 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.50
Contribution2.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect3.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.25
Questions3.50
Open full professor record
Anjali Kalagiri 5 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.75
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Lane Marie Terry 7 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.75
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Ashutosh Mishra 19 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Serim Park 8 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.45
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Brandon Willey 2 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection1.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.50
Reflection3.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Blaine Cooper 6 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.90
Reflection3.75
Respect3.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions3.85
Open full professor record
Sydney Edwards 8 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.25
Reflection4.65
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Camille Conte 15 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.65
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Vanessa Nguyen 9 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.90
Reflection4.55
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Zhen Cai 4 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Ruhi Patel 5 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Brenner Klein 9 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Eric Lian 6 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.15
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.50
Reflection3.75
Respect3.60
Creativity2.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.65
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Aubrey Wolfe 12 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.35
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect4.80
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Clare Hermanson 12 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.10
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.30
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Ethan Fink 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jonquil Loeffelholz 7 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.50
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.30
Reflection3.10
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions3.75
Open full professor record
Qiucheng Xu 8 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.75
Respect4.70
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.10
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Novik Thomas 23 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.95
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Connor Allen 6 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.25
Contribution4.25
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Micah Robyn 5 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Zahra Linsky 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Nicole Clark 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.