Course record CHEM
CHEM 1114
Laboratory in General Chemistry 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable228 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Doug Pazitka-Dorado 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andrew Levin 9 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.85
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.30
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Nayoung Joyce Hur 11 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Austin Dean Bargmann 11 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.45
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Joseph Patrick D'Alesio 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.80
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.10
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Yuchun Cai 14 reported responses 3.01Eval / 5
Overall3.01 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.15
Technology3.60
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration1.65
Connection2.50
Contribution2.05
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.35
Grading3.55
Reflection2.95
Respect3.50
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.35
Interaction2.90
Challenge2.95
Questions4.05
Heinrich Johannes Salzmann 26 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.49
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.38
Connection3.36
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.71
Grading3.61
Reflection4.19
Respect4.83
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.01
Jason Schoeller Grue Newald 15 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.45
Respect4.55
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Wenhan Ou 17 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.30
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.90
Reflection3.75
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.35
Questions4.10
Casey Davis 18 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.05
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.95
Questions4.55
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.