Course record CHEM
CHEM 1114
Laboratory in General Chemistry 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable228 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Doug Pazitka-Dorado 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andrew Levin 9 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.85
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.30
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Nayoung Joyce Hur 11 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Austin Dean Bargmann 11 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.45
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Joseph Patrick D'Alesio 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.80
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.10
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Yuchun Cai 14 reported responses 3.01Eval / 5
Overall3.01 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.15
Technology3.60
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration1.65
Connection2.50
Contribution2.05
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.35
Grading3.55
Reflection2.95
Respect3.50
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.35
Interaction2.90
Challenge2.95
Questions4.05
Heinrich Johannes Salzmann 26 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.49
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.38
Connection3.36
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.71
Grading3.61
Reflection4.19
Respect4.83
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.01
Jason Schoeller Grue Newald 15 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.45
Respect4.55
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Wenhan Ou 17 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.30
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.90
Reflection3.75
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.35
Questions4.10
Casey Davis 18 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.05
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.95
Questions4.55
Carlos E Canales Moya 8 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology3.96
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.04
Connection3.78
Contribution3.46
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.35
Grading4.03
Reflection3.80
Respect4.18
Creativity3.53
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.07
Questions4.00
Matthew Paul Mohacey 24 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.42
Contribution3.38
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.42
Grading3.65
Reflection4.23
Respect4.44
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.87
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.32
Questions4.21
Samuel Wallace Schreiber 9 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration1.65
Connection3.65
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection3.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.20
Questions4.10
Raythe Elliett Douglass Owens 19 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.85
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.55
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Rishabh Shankar Tennankore 16 reported responses 2.78Eval / 5
Overall2.78 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology2.95
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration1.85
Connection2.65
Contribution2.25
Discussion2.70
Inclusivity2.10
Grading2.85
Reflection3.05
Respect3.85
Creativity2.85
Feedback2.30
Interaction2.65
Challenge2.90
Questions2.90
Danielle Elizabeth Guillen 17 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.15
Connection3.20
Contribution3.45
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.35
Reflection4.10
Respect4.55
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.55
Challenge3.80
Questions4.50
Jingyi Wu 15 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.24
Contribution3.17
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity2.13
Grading3.65
Reflection3.82
Respect4.13
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.04
Interaction3.65
Challenge3.48
Questions3.96
Yiqun Yao 15 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.65
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.70
Reflection3.60
Respect4.55
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.85
Questions4.30
Arindam Sau 24 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.62
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.74
Reflection4.03
Respect4.51
Creativity4.14
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.73
Questions3.76
Maya Grace Liester 28 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.32
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.50
Reflection4.81
Respect4.91
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.71
Questions4.82
Emily Brucks 33 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration2.88
Connection3.58
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.03
Grading4.51
Reflection4.30
Respect4.49
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.67
Questions4.55
Justin Louis Ratkovec 19 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.31
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.63
Reflection4.29
Respect4.84
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.54
Questions4.76
Michael T Nagel 12 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.60
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.45
Respect4.70
Creativity3.55
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Christopher Ill 13 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.45
Reflection4.15
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Skylar Javin Sherman 12 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration2.25
Connection3.65
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.15
Reflection3.95
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.35
Questions4.40
Mary Margaret O'Connor 7 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joseph Watson Raso 7 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Robyn Sjovold 18 reported responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.37
Collaboration2.10
Connection2.53
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.41
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.37
Reflection4.10
Respect4.22
Creativity3.76
Feedback3.41
Interaction3.17
Challenge3.64
Questions3.64
Logan Daniel Mccoy 9 reported responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.25
Connection3.10
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.25
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.60
Reflection3.30
Respect4.70
Creativity2.90
Feedback3.05
Interaction3.55
Challenge3.25
Questions3.90
Sarila Morgan Ekin 3 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zachary Ross Schiffman 18 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.75
Contribution3.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.45
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.65
Questions4.50
Lucy Hall 16 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.80
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.85
Reflection4.45
Respect4.70
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Randall Byron Chiu 19 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.85
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.40
Reflection4.15
Respect4.25
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.95
Questions4.20
Seonsik Yun 18 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.05
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.75
Reflection4.25
Respect4.70
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Katelyn E Jewell 5 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Aseem Milind Visal 17 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.05
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.45
Grading3.25
Reflection3.35
Respect3.70
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.35
Questions3.40
Alexa Rae Carollo 6 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.58
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.68
Grading3.05
Reflection4.63
Respect4.82
Creativity3.23
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.68
Questions4.05
John Travis Chambers 8 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Shea Henning Siwik 20 reported responses 3.39Eval / 5
Overall3.39 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.25
Connection2.75
Contribution2.65
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity2.45
Grading3.45
Reflection3.30
Respect4.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.30
Challenge3.60
Questions4.00
Kyle Anthony Mcmillan 11 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.25
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.65
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.65
Challenge4.60
Questions4.00
Paul Ryan Zayka 18 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.30
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.74
Reflection4.69
Respect5.00
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.89
Questions5.00
Brian E Riggs 16 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.65
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.05
Reflection3.80
Respect4.35
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.45
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.85
Victoria Arau 13 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.40
Contribution3.45
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.60
Reflection4.05
Respect4.75
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.95
Questions4.45
Sashi R Weerawarana 2 reported responses 3.15Eval / 5
Overall3.15 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect3.50
Creativity2.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Steven Joseph Scappaticci 23 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.12
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.24
Reflection4.42
Respect4.97
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Maoj Awad 8 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Angelina Lisa Leonardi 33 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.60
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.25
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Cassius Clay Boyd 11 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.75
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity1.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Michael Murphy Sullivan 33 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.85
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.76
Reflection4.49
Respect4.89
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.72
Questions4.90
Natalie Bess Lemessurier 9 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.25
Contribution3.35
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Rachel Lynn Vanosdol 4 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect3.80
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Jessica Marie Rodino 14 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.25
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.05
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Dakota Ross Hunt 27 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Jessica Song 17 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration4.42
Connection3.46
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.02
Grading4.08
Reflection4.42
Respect4.71
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.65
Questions4.49
Jo Sony Kurian 17 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.98
Connection3.69
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.08
Grading3.81
Reflection4.98
Respect4.98
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.97
Questions4.98
Samantha Michelle Rau 13 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Benjamin Rich 11 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.30
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.05
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Douglas J Pazitka-Dorado Jr 9 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.35
Connection3.75
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.75
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Leo R Romanetz 15 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.10
Grading3.55
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.35
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.75
Questions4.05
Makky Mousa-Makky 8 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.50
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.75
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.55
Cooper Scott Ast 36 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.71
Connection3.82
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.45
Reflection4.50
Respect4.54
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.69
Questions4.79
Benjamin R Feingold 12 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.35
Grading4.30
Reflection3.85
Respect4.10
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.35
Ryan Kenneth Messer 9 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Rory Robert Mcclish 11 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.20
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Shamira Claire Gonzalez 7 reported responses 3.22Eval / 5
Overall3.22 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.35
Contribution2.75
Discussion2.75
Inclusivity2.20
Grading1.90
Reflection3.90
Respect3.90
Creativity2.40
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge3.35
Questions4.10
Rida Noor 10 reported responses 3.32Eval / 5
Overall3.32 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.10
Contribution2.95
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.65
Reflection3.55
Respect3.50
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.15
Interaction3.45
Challenge3.30
Questions3.60
Jose De Jesus Rivera 11 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity2.95
Grading4.35
Reflection4.45
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.00
Questions4.75
Chen Li 13 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.15
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.05
Reflection4.05
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge3.50
Questions4.25
Jared Peter Bozzone 9 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.15
Connection2.90
Contribution3.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity1.60
Grading4.45
Reflection3.65
Respect4.90
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.95
Questions5.00
Brian Vincent Clark 10 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.20
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.15
Grading3.50
Reflection3.50
Respect3.65
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.80
Questions3.30
Janine Dorothy Sempel 9 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.10
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.15
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.95
Questions4.30
Iliya Sabzevari 8 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.10
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Chris Courter 5 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Lane Marie Terry 15 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.95
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Srijan Bhattacharyya 14 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.25
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.35
Connection2.90
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.05
Reflection3.55
Respect4.15
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.15
Questions4.15
David Vaisar 12 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.50
Contribution3.75
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.60
Reflection4.15
Respect3.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.95
Questions4.05
Ashley Elizabeth Sullivan 19 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.35
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
James Spencer Stewart 4 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Duk Kyu Yi 3 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Jennifer Lynn Sormberger 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Yu Zhou 42 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology3.21
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.79
Grading3.54
Reflection3.66
Respect3.72
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.26
Interaction4.01
Challenge3.76
Questions3.91
Benjamin Franklin Hammel 12 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.65
Reflection4.35
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Liang-Chun Lin 5 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.40
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Ben Rich 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zach Wiethorn 3 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading2.70
Reflection4.30
Respect3.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions3.70
Zack Krajnak 11 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.23
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration4.57
Connection2.84
Contribution3.42
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.08
Grading3.14
Reflection4.00
Respect3.22
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.08
Questions4.23
Dhileep Kumar Jayashankar 12 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.05
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.25
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.20
Omar Hassan 8 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Roberto Cardenas 19 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.16
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.01
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.21
Reflection4.51
Respect4.66
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.41
Questions4.51
Dang Nguyen 5 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology3.75
Synthesis2.25
Collaboration3.75
Connection1.50
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.75
Grading2.25
Reflection3.75
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.25
Questions3.75
Samer Hammoodi 12 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.25
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.50
Jordan Winetrout 31 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.89
Connection3.96
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.05
Reflection4.66
Respect4.86
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.45
Questions4.58
Bryce Knutson 13 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.95
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.55
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Kelsey Levine 31 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.86
Connection3.71
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.52
Reflection4.38
Respect4.79
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.66
Questions4.86
Saghar Rezaie Kouhestani 21 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration4.72
Connection3.66
Contribution4.04
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity3.78
Grading3.98
Reflection4.27
Respect4.01
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.43
Challenge3.97
Questions4.34
Miles San Soucie 18 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.30
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Minyan Wang 6 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Leyla Akh 17 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.95
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Chuy Rivera 23 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.06
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.28
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.02
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions4.91
Michael Sands 10 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.65
Connection2.65
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.65
Grading2.25
Reflection3.60
Respect3.70
Creativity2.90
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions2.80
Nianzi Liu 12 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Kyle Tyner 16 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.55
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Brandon Aaron Bishop 9 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.10
Samuel Coates 10 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection2.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.95
Reflection3.75
Respect4.90
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge3.65
Questions4.50
Ethan Crann 6 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ally Stjean 10 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.95
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.65
Respect4.35
Creativity3.15
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Lillian Mortensen 13 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Andrew Lazaro Sarino 5 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.20
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.00
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity1.50
Grading3.40
Reflection3.80
Respect3.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.00
Justin Speregen 13 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Garrett Evenson 3 reported responses 3.08Eval / 5
Overall3.08 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.30
Contribution3.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.00
Reflection3.30
Respect5.00
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.30
Questions3.30
Olusola Akinbami 9 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.40
Reflection3.85
Respect4.65
Creativity2.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions3.50
Patrick Holland 34 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology4.01
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.89
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.07
Reflection4.45
Respect4.71
Creativity3.64
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.61
Questions4.49
Leonard Cahya 7 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.10
Contribution3.70
Discussion2.90
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.90
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.30
Questions3.90
Bola Odunaro 13 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.95
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Monica Ochoa 12 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.40
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.45
Reflection4.00
Respect4.10
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.25
Questions4.60
Ashleigh Parish 13 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.35
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.35
Qiucheng Xu 11 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.01
Collaboration4.90
Connection2.97
Contribution3.49
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity2.56
Grading3.53
Reflection3.86
Respect4.28
Creativity3.93
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.27
Challenge3.97
Questions3.52
Bailey Knierim 15 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.70
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.95
Keller Elswick 8 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Barbara Morales 6 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.25
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Romulo Cruz Simbron 6 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.00
Maddie Klumb 19 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.15
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Apurva Sharma 40 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.17
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.35
Reflection4.53
Respect4.81
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.66
Questions4.66
Vikina Martinez 9 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions3.90
Ellen Broering 3 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.33
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection4.67
Interaction4.67
Ruhi Patel 8 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.46
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.42
Grading3.96
Reflection4.80
Respect4.78
Creativity4.92
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.90
Questions4.96
Jack Joseph Elwood 10 reported responses 2.66Eval / 5
Overall2.66 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.90
Technology2.20
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection2.10
Contribution2.70
Discussion2.30
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.70
Reflection3.00
Respect2.10
Creativity2.70
Feedback2.70
Interaction2.60
Challenge2.80
Questions2.70
Mia Muse 16 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.55
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Charlie Lu 10 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.08
Contribution4.43
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.69
Grading3.75
Reflection4.39
Respect4.13
Creativity3.88
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.73
Challenge3.93
Questions4.73
Emily Zabor 3 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Daniel Estrin 14 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.55
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Yihan Wu 9 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.10
Contribution4.05
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.30
Reflection3.60
Respect3.50
Creativity3.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
John Rynk 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.95
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.20
Bert Cham 16 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.20
Reflection4.15
Respect4.60
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Niels Harley Damrauer 1 reported responses 2.14Eval / 5
Overall2.14 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection2.00
Contribution1.00
Reflection2.00
Interaction3.00
Laura Denton 29 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.32
Reflection4.39
Respect4.77
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.61
Questions4.89
Yukai Tomsovic 9 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Jonathan Lee 29 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.17
Reflection4.27
Respect4.76
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.54
Questions4.71
Hamza Ansar 15 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.65
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.30
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.05
Questions4.10
Clara Lietzke 21 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Jeff Price 7 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.25
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.40
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.75
Questions4.50
Omar Armenta 3 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback2.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.70
Questions4.00
Morgane Herlory 14 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.18
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.39
Reflection4.62
Respect4.38
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.49
Questions4.31
Andre Schaum 26 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.85
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.00
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Olivia Pear 15 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Daria Sukhareva 25 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.14
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity2.82
Grading4.36
Reflection4.74
Respect4.71
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.83
Questions4.89
Matteo Poma 11 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Nikki Wrobel 7 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.70
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.30
Reflection3.70
Respect4.20
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.90
Questions3.60
Brian Nies 16 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.65
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.35
Reflection4.20
Respect4.15
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Denver Talley 8 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.70
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.35
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.45
Questions4.85
Ellie Lander 10 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Taime Clark 39 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.38
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.13
Reflection4.66
Respect4.88
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.76
Questions4.80
Jim Hall 9 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.65
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Danya Al Nazal 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Drew Blauth 9 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.65
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.35
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.35
Questions4.35
Kathryn Bairley 3 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jill Addington 9 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.60
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.55
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.45
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.65
Katie Stevenson 18 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Cameron Mollazadeh 13 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.35
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Baljit Singh 9 reported responses 3.43Eval / 5
Overall3.43 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection2.45
Contribution3.45
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.05
Grading2.85
Reflection3.55
Respect3.70
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.85
Questions4.00
Ashutosh Mishra 31 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.97
Connection3.78
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.69
Reflection4.68
Respect4.86
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.84
Questions4.94
Liam Warren 13 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Shota Hasegawa 6 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection2.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.90
Questions3.90
Antonio Yervez 12 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.85
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.45
Andrew Chomas 3 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Erin Jacoski 27 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.21
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.38
Reflection4.44
Respect4.74
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.50
Questions4.86
Marcus Mullen 26 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.18
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.15
Reflection4.51
Respect4.71
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.67
Questions4.79
Grace Shelby 14 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.90
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.55
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Sofia Allison 9 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Natalie Zeps 21 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.36
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.70
Reflection4.68
Respect4.71
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.82
Questions4.82
Amanda Hoffman 9 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.45
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.65
Reflection4.45
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.20
Savanah Neupert 10 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.20
Contribution3.65
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.45
Grading3.15
Reflection4.25
Respect4.25
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.15
Questions3.60
Abhigyan Deoli 46 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.71
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity3.62
Grading3.46
Reflection4.10
Respect4.58
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.15
Questions4.15
Leo Bloxham 35 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.42
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.82
Reflection4.59
Respect4.93
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.77
Questions4.95
Piper Read 20 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology3.94
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.59
Connection3.02
Contribution3.48
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.01
Grading3.90
Reflection3.49
Respect4.55
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.43
Challenge3.97
Questions4.24
Pranay Venkatesh 21 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.25
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.48
Reflection4.36
Respect4.93
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.64
Questions4.59
Subrata Pal 32 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology3.23
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.30
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.45
Grading3.53
Reflection4.18
Respect4.58
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.30
Questions4.18
Max Muter 33 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.85
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.96
Connection3.55
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.21
Grading4.19
Reflection4.80
Respect4.94
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.71
Questions4.88
Ryan Benson 39 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.52
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.58
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.85
Questions4.79
Nicole Clark 16 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.33
Connection2.87
Contribution3.38
Discussion3.41
Inclusivity2.15
Grading3.24
Reflection3.55
Respect3.88
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.21
Interaction4.41
Challenge3.33
Questions4.02
Joy Liu 15 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.00
Reflection4.15
Respect4.20
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Micah Duffield 20 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.97
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.88
Grading3.93
Reflection4.55
Respect4.56
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.46
Questions4.65
Zanub Rahman 30 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.11
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.79
Grading4.27
Reflection4.60
Respect4.72
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.73
Questions4.94
Soorya Gnanasegaran 39 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.66
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.09
Contribution3.94
Discussion3.42
Inclusivity3.47
Grading2.87
Reflection3.63
Respect4.37
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.03
Interaction4.39
Challenge3.62
Questions4.14
Shannon Ganley 16 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.40
Grading4.05
Reflection4.30
Respect4.75
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Lily Harmon 13 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.30
Contribution3.77
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.03
Reflection3.90
Respect4.70
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.73
Challenge3.73
Questions4.20
Arriana Bisram 10 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.10
Reflection5.00
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Alina Margarita Mateo 14 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Mak Regan 12 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.85
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Somnath Dutta 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Max Abreu 2 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zhen Cai 13 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.95
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.60
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.70
Questions3.95
Annie Schafer 9 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology2.70
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.80
Questions3.40
Emily Rogers 10 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.65
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Vanessa Nguyen 15 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Micah Robyn 16 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.05
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.95
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Tyler Kenyon 8 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.45
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Caleb Brzezinski 15 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.33
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.31
Grading4.16
Reflection4.54
Respect4.65
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.79
Aubrey Wolfe 9 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Ashly Leos 16 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.33
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.79
Grading4.17
Reflection4.32
Respect4.87
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Zahra Linsky 12 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.15
Reflection4.45
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Sydney Edwards 10 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.60
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.35
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions4.35
Yilni Bioltif 19 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.95
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Blaine Cooper 11 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.72
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.72
Reflection4.72
Respect4.94
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.77
Questions4.91
Eric Lian 13 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.20
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.70
Reflection4.45
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.45
Questions4.45
Sophia Zinn 8 reported responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.85
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration4.60
Connection2.20
Contribution2.50
Discussion2.75
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.00
Reflection3.25
Respect4.90
Creativity3.10
Feedback2.45
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.85
Questions3.10
Nimesha Wickramaratne 6 reported responses 3.17Eval / 5
Overall3.17 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology3.30
Synthesis2.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.10
Contribution2.60
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity1.80
Grading2.40
Reflection3.90
Respect3.50
Creativity1.90
Feedback1.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions3.20
Ananya Sharma 16 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.58
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.45
Contribution3.66
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.06
Reflection4.02
Respect4.77
Creativity3.78
Feedback2.86
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.65
Questions3.66
Novik Thomas 6 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Brenner Klein 9 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.05
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.25
Reflection4.45
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Joseph Delaloye 19 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.23
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.41
Reflection4.58
Respect4.98
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.72
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.78
Zirui Wang 7 reported responses 2.77Eval / 5
Overall2.77 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology2.20
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection2.60
Contribution3.40
Discussion2.90
Inclusivity1.80
Grading1.40
Reflection3.60
Respect3.80
Creativity2.80
Feedback1.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge2.30
Questions2.40
Camille Conte 5 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Serim Park 10 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.60
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.05
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.45
Questions4.00
Nissa Watkins 12 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.35
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Jacob Simonpietri 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Paige Difronzo 15 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.65
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Audrey Lyp 12 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.10
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Laura Breternitz 7 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.50
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.85
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Heejoo Kang 3 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.25
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect3.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.25
Questions4.25
Lillian Welsh 4 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Honghao Wang 9 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Elyse Meade 4 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Gabrielle Ho 9 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Vance Fowler 7 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Nolan Downie 3 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Elisa Del Chiaro 5 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Tyler Grina 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.