Course record BUSM
BUSM 3011
Product Development II
University of Colorado Boulder
1,215 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Thomas Markley Anderson 73 grades · 1 term 3.85GPA
73 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anderson vs. the course average
A
+57.9
B
−35.2
C
−19.9
D
−2.2
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 2 of 75 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Elmer Feliciano Ramos 451 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
451 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ramos vs. the course average
A
−0.1
B
−1.2
C
−0.3
D
+1.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 7 of 458 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
270 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology3.82
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.55
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.84
Grading4.14
Reflection4.31
Respect4.38
Creativity4.36
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.32
Questions4.38
John Andrew Lacy 691 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
691 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lacy vs. the course average
A
−6.1
B
+4.5
C
+2.3
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.1% withdrew · 1 of 692 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
232 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.87
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.45
Reflection4.59
Respect4.75
Creativity4.64
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.58
Questions4.74
Spencer Raymond Imel 25 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Andy Lacy 126 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
126 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.81
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.61
Reflection4.56
Respect4.76
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.57
Questions4.65
David Frank Laverty 61 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.78
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.34
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.37
Reflection3.83
Respect4.40
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.22
Questions4.37
Jason Dana 23 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.55
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.75
Reflection4.20
Respect4.55
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.25
Questions4.40
Nicholas Michael Anderson 24 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.