Course record BUSM
BUSM 2021
Principles of Finance
University of Colorado Boulder
3,516 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score12/100
Needs work
Jeffrey C Merrell 706 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
706 letter grades
Compare with the course
Merrell vs. the course average
A
+4.6
B
+2.5
C
−6.1
D
−1.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 11 of 717 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
559 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.52
Contribution3.59
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.36
Reflection4.10
Respect4.41
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.51
Interaction3.84
Challenge4.25
Questions4.51
Jason Meshnick 124 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
124 letter grades
Compare with the course
Meshnick vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
−1.1
C
−4.1
D
+0.2
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 2 of 126 enrolled.
Overall3.66 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.10
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.80
Reflection3.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.90
Questions4.20
David L Ikenberry 400 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
400 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ikenberry vs. the course average
A
+5.4
B
−4.9
C
−4.2
D
+2.1
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 4 of 404 enrolled.
Overall3.12 / 5
365 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.24
Technology3.67
Synthesis3.04
Collaboration2.51
Connection4.07
Contribution2.74
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.54
Reflection3.28
Respect3.71
Creativity3.01
Feedback2.59
Interaction3.47
Challenge3.60
Questions3.72
Beverly Benita Karns 633 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
633 letter grades
Compare with the course
Karns vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−4.0
C
+2.8
D
−0.1
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 20 of 653 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.40
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.31
Reflection4.10
Respect4.41
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.29
Questions4.36
Peter J Mohr 1,653 grades · 1 term 2.89GPA
1,653 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mohr vs. the course average
A
−3.8
B
+1.8
C
+2.9
D
same
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 20 of 1,673 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
688 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.73
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.28
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.49
Grading4.45
Reflection4.20
Respect4.58
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.71
Thomas Harrison Nelson 10 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.65
Reflection4.00
Respect4.10
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.00
Thomas Cavett Nelson 10 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.65
Reflection4.00
Respect4.10
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.