Course record BUSM
BUSM 2010
Principles of Marketing
University of Colorado Boulder
4,007 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score14/100
Needs work
Sandra J Burke 1,032 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
1,032 letter grades
Compare with the course
Burke vs. the course average
A
+3.9
B
+3.5
C
−5.4
D
−1.8
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 9 of 1,041 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
146 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.51
Connection4.82
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.47
Reflection4.52
Respect4.57
Creativity3.81
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.35
Questions4.40
Kevin Christopher Mcmahon 507 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
507 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcmahon vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
−1.0
C
+4.5
D
−2.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 8 of 515 enrolled.
Overall3.86 / 5
127 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.60
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.97
Reflection4.53
Respect4.47
Creativity3.37
Feedback2.77
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.20
Questions4.17
Elmer Feliciano Ramos 506 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
506 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ramos vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
−8.5
C
+2.8
D
−0.4
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 3 of 509 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
359 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.58
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.38
Reflection4.56
Respect4.56
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.37
Questions4.50
Erik Morgan Young 327 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
327 letter grades
Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+9.4
C
−2.1
D
−1.7
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 7 of 334 enrolled.
Bahriye Goren 761 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
761 letter grades
Compare with the course
Goren vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
−3.2
C
−0.4
D
+1.5
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 5 of 766 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.87
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.37
Reflection4.50
Respect4.63
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.50
Questions4.73
Mary Beth Lewis 530 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
530 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lewis vs. the course average
A
−10.4
B
+10.1
C
−1.4
D
+0.7
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 12 of 542 enrolled.
Overall3.49 / 5
123 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.37
Collaboration3.13
Connection4.27
Contribution3.07
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity3.33
Grading3.57
Reflection3.83
Respect3.83
Creativity3.23
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.83
Challenge3.70
Questions3.87
Donald Lichtenstein 344 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
344 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lichtenstein vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
−13.8
C
+10.4
D
+6.8
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 3 of 347 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
169 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology3.68
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.78
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.30
Reflection4.37
Respect4.49
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.08
Challenge4.44
Questions4.57
Emanuela Emilson 75 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology2.55
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.95
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.40
Grading2.70
Reflection3.60
Respect4.35
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.50
Questions3.70
Nicole Zimmermann 21 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.30
Reflection3.90
Respect3.80
Creativity2.90
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.70
Questions3.80
Rodrigo Da Silva Dias 143 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
143 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology3.99
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration3.17
Connection4.71
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.42
Reflection4.31
Respect4.68
Creativity3.51
Feedback3.16
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.36
Questions4.54
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.