Course record BMEN
BMEN 2000
Introduction to Biomedical Engineering
University of Colorado Boulder
435 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below averageMark A Borden 174 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
174 letter grades
Compare with the course
Borden vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−8.2
C
−5.7
D
−2.3
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 4 of 178 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.73
Connection4.93
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.33
Reflection4.50
Respect4.67
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.50
Questions4.77
Lucas A Duncan 29 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Duncan vs. the course average
A
−6.2
B
+0.5
C
+5.7
D
−2.3
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
Overall3.78 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.40
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.00
Reflection3.60
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions3.90
Novella M Bates 232 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
232 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bates vs. the course average
A
−11.4
B
+6.1
C
+3.6
D
+2.0
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 5 of 237 enrolled.
Kang-Ho Song 11 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.40
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.10
Reflection3.60
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.80
Questions4.10
Novella Keeling 203 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
203 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.61
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.53
Reflection4.02
Respect4.55
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.61
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.38
Questions4.48
William Frantz 17 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
James Long 15 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.