Course record BCHM
BCHM 4761
Biochemistry Laboratory
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score76/100
Strong
Frederick Longshore-Neate 9 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kristyn Hayashi 23 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.34
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.52
Reflection4.61
Respect4.80
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.76
Questions4.68
Amy Nicole Conte 18 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.78
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.77
Questions4.85
Kristen Cecila Roy 25 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.70
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.75
Reflection4.54
Respect4.69
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.52
Questions4.62
Marcelo Carlos Sousa 9 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.47
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.61
Grading5.00
Reflection4.28
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.93
Challenge5.00
Questions4.23
James Andrew Goodrich 6 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Cody Hecht 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Chris Rauchet 8 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kian Grimison 7 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.46
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.38
Grading5.00
Reflection4.73
Respect4.88
Creativity4.46
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.73
Questions5.00
Keagan Hesse 6 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.