Course record BCHM

BCHM 4720

Metabolic Pathways and Human Disease

University of Colorado Boulder

365 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 11

Jeffrey Carlyle Cameron 104 grades · 1 term 3.62GPA
68.3% A
28.8% B
2.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

104 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cameron vs. the course average
A +22.0
B −5.7
C −14.1
D −1.6
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

1.9% withdrew · 2 of 106 enrolled.

Karoline Schnizer-Luger 159 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
46.5% A
37.7% B
13.8% C
0.6% D
1.3% F

159 letter grades

Compare with the course
Schnizer-Luger vs. the course average
A +0.2
B +3.2
C −3.1
D −1.0
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 4 of 163 enrolled.

Natalie Ahn 70 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
28.6% A
28.6% B
40.0% C
2.9% D
0.0% F

70 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ahn vs. the course average
A −17.7
B −5.9
C +23.0
D +1.2
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 5 of 75 enrolled.

Halil Aydin 32 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
12.5% A
50.0% B
28.1% C
9.4% D
0.0% F

32 letter grades

Compare with the course
Aydin vs. the course average
A −33.8
B +15.5
C +11.1
D +7.7
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

11.1% withdrew · 4 of 36 enrolled.

Karolin Luger 146 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

146 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.92
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.42
Connection4.80
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.20
Reflection4.21
Respect4.79
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.60
Questions4.01
Dominique Armando Ramirez 66 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

66 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.69
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.89
Reflection4.59
Respect4.94
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.25
Questions4.76
Ian Fleming 18 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Chelsea Marie Toner 12 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Trinity Dillard 19 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.86
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.34
Reflection4.86
Respect5.00
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.78
Questions4.87
Natalie Galvan 44 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.70
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.44
Reflection4.73
Respect4.99
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.66
Questions4.86
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.