Course record BCHM
BCHM 4611
Principles of Biochemistry
University of Colorado Boulder
2,111 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score16/100
Needs work
Ricardo Hugh Stephen 2,111 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
2,111 letter grades
3.7% withdrew · 82 of 2,193 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
1,506 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.57
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.58
Reflection4.34
Respect4.57
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.48
Questions4.74
Shea Henning Siwik 99 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Lauren Claire Atencio 48 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.50
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Logan Daniel Mccoy 59 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.20
Connection4.60
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Noah Lohar 90 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Amanda Hoffman 119 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Savanah Neupert 134 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
134 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Tyler Koo 140 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.50
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Annie Schafer 143 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
143 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.40
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.