Course record BCHM
BCHM 4400
Core Concepts in Physical Chemistry for Biochemists
University of Colorado Boulder
320 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Joseph Falke 99 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
99 letter grades
Compare with the course
Falke vs. the course average
A
+4.9
B
+5.5
C
−5.4
D
−2.2
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 99 enrolled.
Amy E Palmer 79 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
79 letter grades
Compare with the course
Palmer vs. the course average
A
+9.0
B
−5.2
C
−1.3
D
+0.3
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 3 of 82 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.39
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.71
Reflection4.72
Respect4.80
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.81
Robert Kuchta 142 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
142 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kuchta vs. the course average
A
−8.4
B
−1.0
C
+4.5
D
+1.3
F
+3.5
Difference in percentage points.
6.6% withdrew · 10 of 152 enrolled.
Nathaniel Hamel 51 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.51
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.63
Reflection4.90
Respect4.86
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.86
Questions4.94
Rob Kuchta 121 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
121 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.02
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.34
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.76
Grading3.82
Reflection4.36
Respect4.68
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.50
Questions4.34
Joe Falke 47 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.07
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.76
Grading3.63
Reflection4.07
Respect4.35
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.24
Questions4.25
Jeff Kuo 29 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.80
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Melissa Duncan 54 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.25
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.44
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.73
Questions4.71
Vignesh Kasinath 85 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology3.59
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.20
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.12
Reflection4.27
Respect4.24
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.06
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.37
Questions4.19
Jackson Blumer-Ham 44 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.12
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.30
Reflection4.48
Respect4.78
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.59
Questions4.65
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.