Course record BCHM
BCHM 3491
Organic Chemistry 2 for Biochemistry Majors
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable15 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score38/100
Below average
Ethan Grant Miller 2 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Maciej Andrzej Walczak 24 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions3.60
Eric Miller 6 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Wyatt Powell 3 reported responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.70
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity2.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.30
Questions4.70
Wei Zhang 18 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Lacey Jane Wayment 10 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Brandon Aaron Bishop 6 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.35
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.90
Connection2.65
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect3.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.15
Questions4.40
Xiang Wang 25 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology3.32
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration3.04
Connection4.68
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.49
Reflection4.31
Respect4.81
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions3.78
Duk Kyu Yi 10 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Ruiheng Jing 7 reported responses 2.99Eval / 5
Overall2.99 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology2.40
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.00
Connection2.70
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.20
Creativity2.30
Feedback3.00
Interaction2.70
Challenge2.70
Questions3.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.