Course record BCHM

BCHM 2700

Foundations of Biochemistry

University of Colorado Boulder

403 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 11

Ricardo Hugh Stephen 273 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
34.1% A
29.7% B
28.6% C
2.9% D
4.8% F

273 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stephen vs. the course average
A +0.3
B −1.1
C +1.5
D −1.0
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

5.2% withdrew · 15 of 288 enrolled.

Dylan J Taatjes 130 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
33.1% A
33.1% B
23.8% C
6.2% D
3.8% F

130 letter grades

Compare with the course
Taatjes vs. the course average
A −0.7
B +2.3
C −3.2
D +2.2
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

4.4% withdrew · 6 of 136 enrolled.

Julia Ellen Roberts 29 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Michael T Nagel 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Danielle Elizabeth Guillen 13 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.62
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.40
Questions4.93
Akhileshwar Khanal 3 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Owen Rung 8 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kayla Mash 25 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Maria Rogan 22 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.91
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.91
Reflection5.00
Respect4.92
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Grace Shelby 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.