Course record BAIM
BAIM 3220
Introduction to Python Programming
University of Colorado Boulder
800 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average
Ethan Dark 44 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dark vs. the course average
A
+29.2
B
−18.0
C
−10.9
D
−1.5
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 2 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Nelufar Dianna Radpour 35 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Radpour vs. the course average
A
+33.0
B
−25.9
C
−10.3
D
−1.5
F
+4.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 2 of 37 enrolled.
Overall3.79 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.40
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.60
Reflection3.60
Respect4.10
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions4.10
Stephen John Taylor 97 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Taylor vs. the course average
A
+6.2
B
−9.0
C
+4.4
D
−1.5
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 6 of 103 enrolled.
Overall3.30 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity3.10
Grading2.80
Reflection3.10
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.50
Questions3.70
Alexander Rukhotskiy 142 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
142 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rukhotskiy vs. the course average
A
−1.8
B
+5.6
C
−1.2
D
−1.5
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 2 of 144 enrolled.
Overall4.01 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology4.49
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration3.44
Connection4.38
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.66
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.64
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.25
Questions4.74
Abram Kaufman Handler 141 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
141 letter grades
Compare with the course
Handler vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+10.2
C
−3.9
D
−1.5
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 5 of 146 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.33
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.20
Reflection4.42
Respect4.70
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Micah Seth Mcgee 257 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
257 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcgee vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
−4.1
C
+3.6
D
+2.8
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 10 of 267 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
146 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.43
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.62
Reflection4.57
Respect4.48
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.77
Questions4.61
Andrew Clement Williams 84 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
84 letter grades
Compare with the course
Williams vs. the course average
A
−18.6
B
+16.5
C
+2.4
D
−0.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 85 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.73
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.67
Reflection4.51
Respect4.83
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.81
Questions4.89
Steve Taylor 29 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.32
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.32
Connection3.96
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.31
Grading3.54
Reflection3.96
Respect4.12
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.49
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.24
Questions3.95
Lan Sang 10 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.70
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Ben Hoffman 18 reported responses 2.90Eval / 5
Overall2.90 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.30
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.10
Reflection2.70
Respect3.00
Creativity2.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.20
Challenge2.90
Questions3.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.