Course record ATOC

ATOC 3600

Principles of Climate

University of Colorado Boulder

288 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 14

Anondo Dehan Mukherjee 70 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
64.3% A
27.1% B
7.1% C
1.4% D
0.0% F

70 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mukherjee vs. the course average
A +2.1
B −0.3
C +0.5
D −1.7
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 70 enrolled.

Derek Philip Brown 76 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
68.4% A
22.4% B
5.3% C
2.6% D
1.3% F

76 letter grades

Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A +6.3
B −5.1
C −1.3
D −0.5
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.8% withdrew · 3 of 79 enrolled.

Xinyue Wang 75 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
62.7% A
29.3% B
2.7% C
4.0% D
1.3% F

75 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A +0.5
B +1.9
C −3.9
D +0.9
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

5.1% withdrew · 4 of 79 enrolled.

Weiqing Han 67 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
52.2% A
31.3% B
11.9% C
4.5% D
0.0% F

67 letter grades

Compare with the course
Han vs. the course average
A −9.9
B +3.9
C +5.3
D +1.4
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 2 of 69 enrolled.

Anna Carrington Pinckney 26 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 14 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.80
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.50
Questions4.50
Brandon Ricardo Antonio Molina 30 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Peter David Blanken 35 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration2.93
Connection4.94
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.14
Reflection4.53
Respect4.84
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Alessandro Verniani 16 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.50
Josh Mauss 13 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.80
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Show all 14 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.