Course record ATOC
ATOC 3600
Principles of Climate
University of Colorado Boulder
288 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Anondo Dehan Mukherjee 70 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
70 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mukherjee vs. the course average
A
+2.1
B
−0.3
C
+0.5
D
−1.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Derek Philip Brown 76 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−5.1
C
−1.3
D
−0.5
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 3 of 79 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology3.48
Synthesis3.36
Collaboration2.46
Connection3.54
Contribution2.57
Discussion3.39
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.82
Reflection3.36
Respect5.00
Creativity3.39
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.07
Questions4.91
Xinyue Wang 75 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
+1.9
C
−3.9
D
+0.9
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 4 of 79 enrolled.
Overall4.14 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.57
Contribution3.43
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.15
Reflection3.95
Respect4.57
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Weiqing Han 67 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Han vs. the course average
A
−9.9
B
+3.9
C
+5.3
D
+1.4
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 2 of 69 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.31
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.60
Contribution3.71
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.11
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.51
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Anna Carrington Pinckney 26 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 14 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.80
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.50
Questions4.50
Brandon Ricardo Antonio Molina 30 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Peter David Blanken 35 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration2.93
Connection4.94
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.14
Reflection4.53
Respect4.84
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Alessandro Verniani 16 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.50
Josh Mauss 13 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.80
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Allison Fagerson 12 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.30
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.40
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions3.80
Holly Ann Roth 7 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Ona Melvin 19 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Bella Kamplain 5 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration2.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.30
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.80
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.