Course record ATOC

ATOC 3050

Principles of Weather

University of Colorado Boulder

212 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Katja Friedrich 82 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
56.1% A
34.1% B
6.1% C
1.2% D
2.4% F

82 letter grades

Compare with the course
Friedrich vs. the course average
A +17.9
B +0.2
C −9.5
D −6.8
F −1.8

Difference in percentage points.

9.9% withdrew · 9 of 91 enrolled.

Gregory P Byrd 48 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
41.7% A
37.5% B
14.6% C
6.3% D
0.0% F

48 letter grades

Compare with the course
Byrd vs. the course average
A +3.5
B +3.5
C −1.0
D −1.8
F −4.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 48 enrolled.

Mark W. Seefeldt 82 grades · 1 term 2.34GPA
18.3% A
31.7% B
25.6% C
15.9% D
8.5% F

82 letter grades

Compare with the course
Seefeldt vs. the course average
A −19.9
B −2.3
C +10.0
D +7.8
F +4.3

Difference in percentage points.

8.9% withdrew · 8 of 90 enrolled.

Nayoung Joyce Hur 25 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Tessa Mariko Gorte 24 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.75
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Vikas Hanasoge Nataraja 36 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.58
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.99
Reflection4.40
Respect4.63
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.45
Questions4.71
Erin Guderian 7 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
John J. Cassano 7 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.30
Connection4.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.00
Interaction2.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Nadiyah Williams 19 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.48
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.07
Reflection4.53
Respect4.79
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.35
Questions4.61
Ufuk Turuncoglu 12 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.10
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.