Course record ATLS
ATLS 5519
Adv Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
98 grades39 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score75/100
Strong
John David Weiss 29 grades · 1 term 3.97GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Weiss vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
−4.1
C
same
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.58
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.52
Grading3.42
Reflection4.22
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.58
Questions4.83
Justin A Gitlin 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.98GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
5.9% withdrew · 1 of 17 enrolled.
Charlotte Hult 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.98GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.52
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.71
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.88
Questions4.17
Danielle N Szafir 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.92GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.75
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Jill Vanmatre Dupre 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.91GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 14 enrolled.
Matthew M Reiswig 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.71GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.86 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration3.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.93
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.93
Grading5.00
Reflection4.77
Respect4.93
Creativity4.93
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mirela Alistar 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.06
Reflection4.79
Respect4.91
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.99
Questions4.08
Yi Luen Ellen Do 24 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.81
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.70
Reflection4.68
Respect4.76
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.29
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.62
Questions4.74
Daniel Leithinger 20 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.61
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.78
Grading3.86
Reflection4.89
Respect4.98
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.46
Questions4.43
Laura Kay Devendorf 27 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.88
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.97
Reflection4.94
Respect4.95
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.96
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.