Course record ATLS

ATLS 5519

Adv Topics

University of Colorado Boulder

98 grades39 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score75/100
Strong

Professors 39 of 39

John David Weiss 29 grades · 1 term 3.97GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

29 letter grades

Compare with the course
Weiss vs. the course average
A +4.1
B −4.1
C same
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.

Justin A Gitlin 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.98GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

16 letter grades · Limited sample

5.9% withdrew · 1 of 17 enrolled.

Charlotte Hult 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.98GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

16 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.

Danielle N Szafir 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.92GPA
92.3% A
7.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

13 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.

Jill Vanmatre Dupre 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.91GPA
92.9% A
7.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

14 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 14 enrolled.

Matthew M Reiswig 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.71GPA
80.0% A
20.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

10 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.

Mirela Alistar 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.06
Reflection4.79
Respect4.91
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.99
Questions4.08
Yi Luen Ellen Do 24 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.81
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.70
Reflection4.68
Respect4.76
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.29
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.62
Questions4.74
Daniel Leithinger 20 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.61
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.78
Grading3.86
Reflection4.89
Respect4.98
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.46
Questions4.43
Laura Kay Devendorf 27 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.88
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.97
Reflection4.94
Respect4.95
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.96
Joshua Knowles 1 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
John Francis Knowles 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Annie Margaret Bruns 6 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Sharri Zamore 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.08
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.54
Reflection4.08
Respect4.54
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.23
Questions4.54
Arielle Elizabeth Hein 2 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection3.50
Respect3.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Kevin Cook 2 reported responses 3.07Eval / 5
Overall3.07 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.50
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.50
Reflection2.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Mark D Gross 15 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.23
Technology3.23
Synthesis3.38
Collaboration3.81
Connection2.99
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.39
Grading2.49
Reflection2.62
Respect4.41
Creativity4.28
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.37
Challenge3.29
Questions3.33
Daniel W Rankin 7 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.88
Connection3.94
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity4.09
Grading3.98
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.92
Questions4.92
Joel E. Swanson 11 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Carson J Bruns 2 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
John Michael Bacus 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.03
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.97
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.97
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.97
Amy Catherine Banic 6 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.91
Synthesis3.37
Collaboration3.82
Connection2.65
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.18
Grading3.37
Reflection3.46
Respect5.00
Creativity4.09
Feedback3.37
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.18
Questions4.95
Matthew Robert Bethancourt 3 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
David Lobser 4 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.30
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Gabor Molnar 3 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Anthony Thomas Pinter 7 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.46
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.50
Reflection4.76
Respect4.76
Creativity4.87
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.76
Sheiva Rezvani 4 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.88
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Grace Leslie 15 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.51
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.88
Reflection4.44
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.45
Max Nova 2 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading1.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Michael Rivera 5 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration3.53
Connection3.93
Contribution4.96
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.23
Grading4.96
Reflection4.87
Respect4.96
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.96
Questions4.83
John B Bernthal 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration3.39
Connection4.28
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.74
Reflection4.64
Respect4.99
Creativity4.78
Feedback3.72
Interaction3.88
Challenge4.60
Questions4.28
Jonathan Bradley Gallagher 6 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.15
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.61
Questions4.85
Wayne Allen Seltzer 5 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.28
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.87
Grading4.73
Reflection3.10
Respect4.95
Creativity4.79
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.82
Questions4.85
David Andrew Schaal 4 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.35
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback2.85
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
August John Black 7 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.78
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.93
Reflection4.78
Respect4.62
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.62
Questions4.93
Libi Rose Striegl 1 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Ryo Suzuki 11 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.53
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.53
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.03
Reflection4.09
Respect4.39
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.56
Questions4.03
Gabriel Goehring Johnson 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zack Jacobson-Weaver 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.