Course record ATLS
ATLS 3519
Special Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
91 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score63/100
Strong
Daniel W Rankin 31 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rankin vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
+5.0
C
−7.7
D
same
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.88
Reflection4.75
Respect4.98
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.91
Questions4.85
David Andrew Schaal 25 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schaal vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−9.6
C
+0.3
D
same
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
7.4% withdrew · 2 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.93
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.65
Reflection4.62
Respect4.95
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.88
Ian W Hales 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
7.7% withdrew · 1 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Kevin J. Hoth 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.29GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.
Jonathan Bradley Gallagher 4 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Sean A Winters 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Howard Kramer 3 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Grace Leslie 11 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.