Course record ASTR
ASTR 5835
Seminar in Planetary Science
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
David A Brain 10 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Larry Wayne Esposito 13 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.26
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity3.29
Grading3.57
Reflection4.34
Respect4.58
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.26
Questions4.36
Kevin Bartholomew Mc Gouldrick 3 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Nicholas M Schneider 3 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.30
Respect4.30
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.00
Margaret Evelyn Landis 14 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity2.76
Grading4.07
Reflection4.23
Respect4.82
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.50
Questions4.54
Ann Marie Madigan 2 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.99
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration2.99
Connection2.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.02
Reflection5.00
Respect4.01
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.02
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.01
Questions3.02
Paul Hayne 12 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.07
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity1.24
Grading3.13
Reflection4.90
Respect4.97
Creativity4.90
Feedback3.08
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.95
Questions4.96
David M Malaspina 15 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.95
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.27
Reflection4.75
Respect4.93
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.74
Questions4.78
Mark Peter Rast 6 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Cao Dang Pham 1 reported responses 2.89Eval / 5
Overall2.89 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading2.00
Reflection5.00
Respect2.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions2.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.