Course record ASTR
ASTR 3800
Introduction to Scientific Data Analysis and Computing
University of Colorado Boulder
153 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score54/100
Mixed recordWebster C Cash Jr. 63 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
63 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
+5.5
B
−2.7
C
−2.7
D
−1.3
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.0% withdrew · 4 of 67 enrolled.
Jeremiah K Darling 40 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Darling vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
−8.1
C
+1.6
D
+1.2
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
9.1% withdrew · 4 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.78
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.33
Reflection4.88
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.89
Questions4.90
Nathaniel Kerman 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Mark Peter Rast 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.05GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
15.0% withdrew · 3 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Douglas K Duncan 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
10.5% withdrew · 2 of 19 enrolled.
Allyson Leffler 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Webster C Cash 30 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.05
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.68
Reflection4.71
Respect4.95
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.94
Questions4.77
Anna Zuckerman 14 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.90
Questions4.20
Katherine Anne Suess 20 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Wren Suess 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.