Course record ASTR

ASTR 3800

Introduction to Scientific Data Analysis and Computing

University of Colorado Boulder

153 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score54/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 10

Webster C Cash Jr. 63 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
68.3% A
25.4% B
3.2% C
0.0% D
3.2% F

63 letter grades

Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A +5.5
B −2.7
C −2.7
D −1.3
F +1.2

Difference in percentage points.

6.0% withdrew · 4 of 67 enrolled.

Jeremiah K Darling 40 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
70.0% A
20.0% B
7.5% C
2.5% D
0.0% F

40 letter grades

Compare with the course
Darling vs. the course average
A +7.3
B −8.1
C +1.6
D +1.2
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

9.1% withdrew · 4 of 44 enrolled.

Nathaniel Kerman 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
93.8% A
6.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

16 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.

Mark Peter Rast 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.05GPA
29.4% A
58.8% B
11.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

15.0% withdrew · 3 of 20 enrolled.

Douglas K Duncan 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
29.4% A
47.1% B
11.8% C
5.9% D
5.9% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

10.5% withdrew · 2 of 19 enrolled.

Allyson Leffler 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Webster C Cash 30 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.05
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.68
Reflection4.71
Respect4.95
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.94
Questions4.77
Anna Zuckerman 14 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.90
Questions4.20
Katherine Anne Suess 20 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Wren Suess 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.