Course record ASTR

ASTR 3510

Observations and Instrumentation 1

University of Colorado Boulder

113 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score74/100
Strong

Professors 9 of 9

Zachory K Berta-Thompson 62 grades · 1 term 3.91GPA
93.5% A
6.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

62 letter grades

Compare with the course
Berta-Thompson vs. the course average
A +18.3
B −11.2
C −7.1
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 62 enrolled.

Seth D Hornstein 27 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
40.7% A
29.6% B
29.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

27 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hornstein vs. the course average
A −34.5
B +11.9
C +22.5
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.

John Bally 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.50GPA
66.7% A
33.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

4.0% withdrew · 1 of 25 enrolled.

Jay Srikar Chittidi 9 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
William Waalkes 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Rydell Stottlemyer 15 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Mirielle Caradonna 11 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.95
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.95
Grading4.20
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
David Barker 14 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Derric Loya 16 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.