Course record ASTR
ASTR 2040
The Search for Life in the Universe
University of Colorado Boulder
1,379 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Larry Wayne Esposito 165 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
165 letter grades
Compare with the course
Esposito vs. the course average
A
+19.6
B
−10.3
C
−9.0
D
−4.1
F
+3.8
Difference in percentage points.
7.3% withdrew · 13 of 178 enrolled.
Overall3.58 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology3.02
Synthesis3.58
Collaboration3.42
Connection3.54
Contribution3.68
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity3.17
Grading3.28
Reflection3.68
Respect4.02
Creativity3.56
Feedback3.12
Interaction3.89
Challenge3.78
Questions3.81
Meredith Macgregor 369 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
369 letter grades
Compare with the course
Macgregor vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
+4.1
C
−3.8
D
+0.2
F
−3.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 16 of 385 enrolled.
Overall4.42 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.58
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.60
Reflection4.49
Respect4.69
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.49
Questions4.69
Carolyn Alicia Crow 300 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
300 letter grades
Compare with the course
Crow vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
+3.2
C
+1.1
D
−0.7
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 7 of 307 enrolled.
Overall4.43 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.71
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.67
Reflection4.68
Respect4.76
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.63
Questions4.91
Jorge Perez-Gallego 337 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
337 letter grades
Compare with the course
Perez-Gallego vs. the course average
A
−0.9
B
+1.9
C
−0.8
D
−0.9
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 16 of 353 enrolled.
Overall3.81 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.18
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.98
Grading2.90
Reflection4.25
Respect3.13
Creativity4.38
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.38
Challenge4.33
Questions3.51
Patrick O'Brien 208 grades · 1 term 2.49GPA
208 letter grades
Compare with the course
O'Brien vs. the course average
A
−15.8
B
−6.9
C
+13.6
D
+5.4
F
+3.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 7 of 215 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Piyush Agrawal 38 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Brian Michael Hynek 43 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.80
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.60
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.00
Questions3.80
Robert Vincent Kelleher 29 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Ward Howard 5 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Leah Hanen 28 reported responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.10
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.70
Questions3.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.