Course record ASTR

ASTR 2030

Black Holes

University of Colorado Boulder

1,190 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Ann Marie Madigan 322 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
70.5% A
16.1% B
7.8% C
1.6% D
4.0% F

322 letter grades

Compare with the course
Madigan vs. the course average
A +20.9
B −16.2
C −3.9
D −0.8
F same

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 13 of 335 enrolled.

Kirk Alan Long 109 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
64.2% A
23.9% B
2.8% C
2.8% D
6.4% F

109 letter grades

Compare with the course
Long vs. the course average
A +14.6
B −8.5
C −8.9
D +0.4
F +2.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 3 of 112 enrolled.

Jason A Dexter 174 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
31.0% A
57.5% B
8.6% C
1.7% D
1.1% F

174 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dexter vs. the course average
A −18.5
B +25.1
C −3.1
D −0.6
F −2.9

Difference in percentage points.

9.8% withdrew · 19 of 193 enrolled.

Mitchell C Begelman 585 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
40.9% A
35.4% B
16.4% C
2.9% D
4.4% F

585 letter grades

Compare with the course
Begelman vs. the course average
A −8.7
B +3.0
C +4.7
D +0.6
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

7.3% withdrew · 46 of 631 enrolled.

Kate Okun 2 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction4.50
Erin Shimoda 24 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.65
Reflection4.68
Respect4.85
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.72
Questions4.62
Hannalore Gerling-Dunsmore 19 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.23
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.05
Reflection4.48
Respect4.97
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.75
Questions4.88
Constanza Echiburu 41 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.10
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Julia M Comerford 52 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Taeho Ryu 33 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.