Course record ASTR
ASTR 2000
Ancient Astronomies of the World
University of Colorado Boulder
1,254 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score14/100
Needs work
John Michael Keller 394 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
394 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keller vs. the course average
A
+9.3
B
+1.6
C
−3.6
D
−4.4
F
−2.9
Difference in percentage points.
8.4% withdrew · 36 of 430 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
296 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.38
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.24
Reflection4.39
Respect4.76
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.51
Questions4.49
Marialis Rosario Franco 304 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
304 letter grades
Compare with the course
Franco vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−5.5
C
−3.5
D
−1.8
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 17 of 321 enrolled.
Nickolas Alexander Conant 313 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
313 letter grades
Compare with the course
Conant vs. the course average
A
−7.0
B
+4.8
C
+2.0
D
+1.0
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 13 of 326 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
154 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.26
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.27
Connection4.42
Contribution3.66
Discussion3.96
Inclusivity4.52
Grading3.67
Reflection4.14
Respect4.45
Creativity4.02
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.04
Questions3.87
Michael Zawaski 103 grades · 1 term 2.27GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zawaski vs. the course average
A
−25.4
B
+0.8
C
+14.2
D
+8.2
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
8.8% withdrew · 10 of 113 enrolled.
Erica Ellingson 140 grades · 1 term 2.25GPA
140 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ellingson vs. the course average
A
−17.3
B
−3.9
C
+2.7
D
+8.1
F
+10.4
Difference in percentage points.
7.9% withdrew · 12 of 152 enrolled.
Mike Zawaski 60 reported responses 2.84Eval / 5
Overall2.84 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology2.60
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.20
Grading2.10
Reflection3.10
Respect3.60
Creativity2.90
Feedback1.90
Interaction3.60
Challenge2.90
Questions2.90
Matt Kalscheur 71 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.20
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Marialis Rosario 288 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
288 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.18
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.27
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.54
Grading3.80
Reflection4.19
Respect4.50
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.51
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.20
Questions4.19
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.