Course record ASTR
ASTR 1030
Accelerated Introductory Astronomy 1
University of Colorado Boulder
714 grades28 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average
Zachory K Berta-Thompson 123 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
123 letter grades
Compare with the course
Berta-Thompson vs. the course average
A
+17.8
B
−5.2
C
−7.8
D
−2.3
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 7 of 130 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
185 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.87
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.68
Reflection4.88
Respect4.99
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.87
Questions4.88
Benjamin P Brown 113 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
+4.2
B
−2.0
C
+1.3
D
−2.2
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 1 of 114 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.60
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.02
Reflection4.49
Respect4.90
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.59
Questions4.50
John Michael Keller 42 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keller vs. the course average
A
+1.1
B
−5.0
C
+3.2
D
+3.2
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
8.7% withdrew · 4 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
David M Malaspina 213 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
213 letter grades
Compare with the course
Malaspina vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
−1.7
C
−1.2
D
+0.8
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 10 of 223 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
201 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.41
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.93
Reflection4.68
Respect4.71
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.60
Questions4.79
Robert E Ergun 103 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ergun vs. the course average
A
−6.2
B
+4.7
C
+2.5
D
−2.0
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
8.0% withdrew · 9 of 112 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
David A Brain 120 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
120 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brain vs. the course average
A
−16.4
B
+7.9
C
+5.6
D
+3.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 8 of 128 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Alex Haughton 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.35
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Abhishek Lohith Kumar 44 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.15
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.08
Reflection4.25
Respect4.38
Creativity4.44
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.62
Justus Gibson 11 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.85
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.85
Patrick Ryan Behr 9 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.45
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.