Course record ASTR
ASTR 1030
Accelerated Introductory Astronomy 1
University of Colorado Boulder
714 grades28 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average
Zachory K Berta-Thompson 123 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
123 letter grades
Compare with the course
Berta-Thompson vs. the course average
A
+17.8
B
−5.2
C
−7.8
D
−2.3
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 7 of 130 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
185 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.87
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.68
Reflection4.88
Respect4.99
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.87
Questions4.88
Benjamin P Brown 113 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
+4.2
B
−2.0
C
+1.3
D
−2.2
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 1 of 114 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.60
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.02
Reflection4.49
Respect4.90
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.59
Questions4.50
John Michael Keller 42 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keller vs. the course average
A
+1.1
B
−5.0
C
+3.2
D
+3.2
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
8.7% withdrew · 4 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
David M Malaspina 213 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
213 letter grades
Compare with the course
Malaspina vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
−1.7
C
−1.2
D
+0.8
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 10 of 223 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
201 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.41
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.93
Reflection4.68
Respect4.71
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.60
Questions4.79
Robert E Ergun 103 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ergun vs. the course average
A
−6.2
B
+4.7
C
+2.5
D
−2.0
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
8.0% withdrew · 9 of 112 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
David A Brain 120 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
120 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brain vs. the course average
A
−16.4
B
+7.9
C
+5.6
D
+3.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 8 of 128 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Alex Haughton 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.35
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Abhishek Lohith Kumar 44 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.15
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.08
Reflection4.25
Respect4.38
Creativity4.44
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.62
Justus Gibson 11 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.85
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.85
Patrick Ryan Behr 9 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.45
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Michelle Wooten 41 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Kiana Burton 11 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.15
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.50
Reflection4.45
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Peter Tatum 6 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Patcharapol Wachiraphan 9 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.90
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.25
Respect4.55
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.20
Questions4.75
Justin Lorence Wang 9 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Nhat Dang 21 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.18
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.26
Reflection4.48
Respect4.86
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.58
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.64
Questions4.93
Steven Latimer 14 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.55
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Maggie Huber 19 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.79
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.78
Reflection4.53
Respect4.99
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.71
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.81
Jackson Avery 40 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.68
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.52
Reflection4.63
Respect4.85
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Drake Miller 19 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.55
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Aylecia Susanne Lattimer 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.45
Contribution4.35
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Chloe Benton 11 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.45
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Autumn Stephens 11 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Rhali Attar 21 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.05
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Jacob Monahan 4 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Valerie Arriero 12 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.65
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Abdullah Alshaffi 17 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.59
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity3.94
Grading3.91
Reflection4.33
Respect4.79
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.52
Questions4.95
Jay Cessna 28 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.44
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.78
Reflection4.82
Respect4.94
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.89
Questions4.93
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.