Course record ASTR

ASTR 1010

Introductory Astronomy: The Solar System w/Lab

University of Colorado Boulder

1,202 grades35 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 35

Marialis Rosario Franco 195 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
48.7% A
34.9% B
10.8% C
1.5% D
4.1% F

195 letter grades

Compare with the course
Franco vs. the course average
A +14.5
B +0.8
C −11.4
D −4.3
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 8 of 203 enrolled.

Seth D Hornstein 202 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
40.1% A
31.2% B
21.8% C
5.0% D
2.0% F

202 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hornstein vs. the course average
A +5.9
B −2.8
C −0.3
D −0.9
F −1.8

Difference in percentage points.

4.7% withdrew · 10 of 212 enrolled.

John Michael Keller 410 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
32.9% A
33.2% B
21.7% C
7.6% D
4.6% F

410 letter grades

Compare with the course
Keller vs. the course average
A −1.3
B −0.9
C −0.4
D +1.7
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 14 of 424 enrolled.

Nicholas M Schneider 193 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
24.4% A
34.7% B
32.6% C
4.7% D
3.6% F

193 letter grades

Compare with the course
Schneider vs. the course average
A −9.8
B +0.7
C +10.5
D −1.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 7 of 200 enrolled.

David A Brain 202 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
26.2% A
37.1% B
24.3% C
8.4% D
4.0% F

202 letter grades

Compare with the course
Brain vs. the course average
A −8.0
B +3.1
C +2.1
D +2.6
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.8% withdrew · 8 of 210 enrolled.

Guido Insinger 21 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.20
Reflection4.28
Respect4.63
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Viktoria Meyerhoff 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Leah Zuckerman 19 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.57
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.56
Reflection4.58
Respect4.84
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.77
Questions4.98
Abhishek Lohith Kumar 43 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.39
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.14
Reflection4.57
Respect4.63
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.72
Questions4.61
Jianzhao Wang 13 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.95
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.00
Reflection4.45
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.05
Questions4.00
Show all 35 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.