Course record ASTR
ASTR 1010
Introductory Astronomy: The Solar System w/Lab
University of Colorado Boulder
1,202 grades35 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average
Marialis Rosario Franco 195 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
195 letter grades
Compare with the course
Franco vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
+0.8
C
−11.4
D
−4.3
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 8 of 203 enrolled.
Seth D Hornstein 202 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
202 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hornstein vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
−2.8
C
−0.3
D
−0.9
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 10 of 212 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
John Michael Keller 410 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
410 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keller vs. the course average
A
−1.3
B
−0.9
C
−0.4
D
+1.7
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 14 of 424 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
372 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.42
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.49
Reflection4.60
Respect4.72
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.58
Questions4.69
Nicholas M Schneider 193 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
193 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schneider vs. the course average
A
−9.8
B
+0.7
C
+10.5
D
−1.2
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 7 of 200 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
David A Brain 202 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
202 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brain vs. the course average
A
−8.0
B
+3.1
C
+2.1
D
+2.6
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 8 of 210 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Guido Insinger 21 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.20
Reflection4.28
Respect4.63
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Viktoria Meyerhoff 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Leah Zuckerman 19 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.57
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.56
Reflection4.58
Respect4.84
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.77
Questions4.98
Abhishek Lohith Kumar 43 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.39
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.14
Reflection4.57
Respect4.63
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.72
Questions4.61
Jianzhao Wang 13 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.95
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.00
Reflection4.45
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.05
Questions4.00
Molly Nehring 19 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Kathleen Laughton 16 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Nhat Dang 25 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.58
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.49
Reflection4.57
Respect4.83
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Alessandro Verniani 20 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.45
Reflection4.20
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.45
Questions4.60
Pravita Hallur 8 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Marialis Rosario 95 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Steven Latimer 6 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
David Barker 30 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.40
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.46
Reflection4.53
Respect4.83
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.58
Questions4.96
Adam Spicer 33 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.90
Reflection4.95
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Sajal Gupta 19 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.85
Reflection4.45
Respect4.45
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Valerie Wong 18 reported responses 3.01Eval / 5
Overall3.01 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.90
Technology2.25
Synthesis2.65
Collaboration4.25
Connection2.50
Contribution3.30
Discussion2.80
Inclusivity2.15
Grading2.65
Reflection2.85
Respect3.50
Creativity3.15
Feedback2.75
Interaction3.85
Challenge2.50
Questions2.65
Kiana Burton 24 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.65
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.70
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Leah Simon 82 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Natalia Porraz 15 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.15
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.15
Reflection4.25
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.05
Questions4.65
Kate Okun 12 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.15
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.70
Reflection4.05
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.15
Questions4.20
Vanessa Brown 20 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.45
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.75
Susanne Byrd 28 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.11
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.12
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.29
Reflection4.38
Respect4.62
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.81
Challenge3.90
Questions4.43
Patcharapol Wachiraphan 19 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.69
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.72
Reflection4.53
Respect4.53
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.78
Questions4.83
Ryan Yik Wah Lau 11 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.25
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions3.85
Brandon Hilliard 11 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.95
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions3.80
Ahmed Bakr 27 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.99
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.89
Grading3.93
Reflection4.37
Respect4.58
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.40
Questions4.28
Sydney Furman 27 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.78
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.76
Reflection4.80
Respect4.97
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.85
Questions4.93
Elise Fuller 17 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.45
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.85
Anika Mahajan 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Nusrath Jahan 34 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.01
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.10
Reflection4.26
Respect4.60
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.52
Questions4.58
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.