Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Prof. Nisar Ahmed
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record ASEN
ASEN 5519
Special Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
356 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score64/100
Strong
Allison Paige Anderson 32 grades · 1 term 3.88GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anderson vs. the course average
A
+11.9
B
−8.8
C
−1.4
D
same
F
−1.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.91 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Torin K Clark 42 grades · 1 term 3.81GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A
+10.2
B
−7.1
C
−1.4
D
same
F
−1.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 1 of 43 enrolled.
Overall4.43 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.15
Reflection4.30
Respect4.95
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.85
Ross Chaudhry 45 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
45 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chaudhry vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
−5.8
C
−1.4
D
same
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 3 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.65
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.33
Reflection4.80
Respect4.72
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Hisham Ali 74 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
74 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ali vs. the course average
A
−8.0
B
+9.7
C
−1.4
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 3 of 77 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.85
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.87
Reflection4.77
Respect4.96
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.70
Questions4.51
Zachary Sunberg 76 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sunberg vs. the course average
A
−4.5
B
+2.3
C
+1.2
D
same
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
6.2% withdrew · 5 of 81 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.49
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.32
Reflection4.60
Respect4.96
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.53
Questions4.81
Morteza Mehdi Lahijanian 43 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lahijanian vs. the course average
A
−12.8
B
+6.6
C
+5.6
D
same
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 3 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.12 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.79
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.72
Grading3.56
Reflection4.83
Respect4.84
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.77
Questions4.39
Nisar Razzi Ahmed 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.95GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.95
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity2.36
Grading4.91
Reflection4.68
Respect4.94
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Eric W Frew 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.84GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.15
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Katya Sofia Arquilla 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.53GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Kenneth E Jansen 5 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.65
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.35
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback2.75
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.10
Course documents
Syllabi 3
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2024 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Spring 2024 · Section not specified
Brian M. Argrow, Glenn L. Murphy Distinguished Professor
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.