Fall 2025 · Section not specified
Prof. Khosro Ghobadi-Far · Instructor record
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record ASEN
ASEN 5044
Statistical Estimation for Dynamical Systems
University of Colorado Boulder
383 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Nisar Razzi Ahmed 164 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
164 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ahmed vs. the course average
A
+17.1
B
−17.0
C
−0.5
D
+0.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 3 of 167 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.36
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.12
Grading4.33
Reflection4.48
Respect4.86
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.35
Questions4.43
Tomoko Matsuo 60 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
60 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matsuo vs. the course average
A
−2.9
B
+2.6
C
−0.5
D
−0.3
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 60 enrolled.
Penina Axelrad 84 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
84 letter grades
Compare with the course
Axelrad vs. the course average
A
−15.3
B
+15.4
C
+0.7
D
−0.3
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 85 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Kirsten Leigh Strandjord 47 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Strandjord vs. the course average
A
−11.7
B
+13.0
C
−0.5
D
−0.3
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 1 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.90
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.60
Questions4.55
Jay W Mcmahon 28 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcmahon vs. the course average
A
−28.4
B
+26.2
C
+3.0
D
−0.3
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 1 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.20
Reflection4.45
Respect4.65
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.45
Questions4.25
Khosro Ghobadi-Far 36 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.25
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Course documents
Syllabi 2
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2024 · Section not specified
Prof. Nisar Ahmed
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.